Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 268816091687-73
6
positions filed
in the 326 files tracked
6
legislative files
of 326 tracked
6
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 326 consultation files tracked so far (29,503 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 925 companies & groups on this site, they rank #99 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€100K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2024
in the register since
Declares membership of
BDI https://bdi.eu/
ZVEI https://zvei.org/
BGA https://bga.de/start
Wirtschaftsrat der CDU e.V https://www.wirtschaftsrat.de
cep https://www.cep.eu/
ICC https://iccwbo.org/
DIHK https://www.dihk.de/de
FDS e.V https://fds-online.de/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026).
Register category
Companies & groups
Head office
Künzelsau, Germany
EU office
Brüssel
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 30 Aug 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Work at Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG filed 6 positions between 10 Dec 2024 and 30 Jul 2026, across 6 of the 326 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 6 times.
The Würth Group welcomes the Commission’s objective of establishing, through this implementing act, clear rules for taking into account a carbon price paid in third countries. This is an important step to avoid double charging and ensure a level playing field for European companies. At the same time, we would like to draw attention to the significant practical challenges arising from implementation.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Feedback on the planned amendment of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 (EUDR) The Würth Group welcomes the European Commission’s efforts to make the EUDR more feasible through targeted clarifications and practical adjustments and strongly supports the present draft. 1.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Würth Group welcomes and commented on the initiative of the European Commission to define the methodology for the final CBAM period as of 1 January 2026. After two years of implementing CBAM regulation, a key challenge remains the availability and quality of data along global supply chains.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Contribution to the consultation on the establishment of rules for DPP Service Providers We thank us for the opportunity to provide feedback. The Würth Group broadly welcomes the implementation of digital product passports and sees it as an important tool to prolong the life cycles of products and reduce their environmental impact.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Würth Group supports the Commission’s objective to ensure equal treatment of goods produced in the EU and in third countries by adapting the CBAM obligations. Of particular importance is the consideration of free allocation of EU ETS allowances, which will be phased out by 2034. Our procurement concerns mainly DIN and standard parts, which are mostly manufactured outside the EU.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Contribution to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) Sale and repurchase of allowances The Würth Group is grateful for the opportunity to comment and would like to draw attention from business practice to aspects of the current draft that are crucial for a workable and legally certain implementation without compromising the instrument’s objective.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Everything on this page comes from Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.