Company · Germany · EU Transparency Register 268816091687-73
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,774 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 1210 companies & groups on this site, they rank #116 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Adolf in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG? so we know who speaks for it.
Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG filed 11 positions between 18 Aug 2020 and 30 Jul 2026, across 11 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 8 times.
Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG (AWKG) supports the objectives of the European Union’s proposal for the Ecodesign Directive for the Sustainable Products Regulation. In doing so, Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG endeavours to manage sustainably, for example by developing innovative products.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Shortcomings: 1. Duplication of information between the CE-marking and the declaration of performance (DoP) unnecessarily increases the administrative burden without improving the quality of the information (see also evaluation report (SWD(2019)1770). 2.
Würth Assessment and Positioning on the CLP Regulation and Revision Die Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG would like to thank the European Commission for the opportunity to comment with a position paper on the proposal to amend the CLP Regulation.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Würth Group welcomes the Commission’s objective of establishing, through this implementing act, clear rules for taking into account a carbon price paid in third countries. This is an important step to avoid double charging and ensure a level playing field for European companies. At the same time, we would like to draw attention to the significant practical challenges arising from implementation.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Feedback on the planned amendment of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2023/1115 (EUDR) The Würth Group welcomes the European Commission’s efforts to make the EUDR more feasible through targeted clarifications and practical adjustments and strongly supports the present draft. 1.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Würth Group welcomes and commented on the initiative of the European Commission to define the methodology for the final CBAM period as of 1 January 2026. After two years of implementing CBAM regulation, a key challenge remains the availability and quality of data along global supply chains.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Contribution to the consultation on the establishment of rules for DPP Service Providers We thank us for the opportunity to provide feedback. The Würth Group broadly welcomes the implementation of digital product passports and sees it as an important tool to prolong the life cycles of products and reduce their environmental impact.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Reuse and sustainability are very important for Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG, while Würth meets the highest quality requirements. Therefore, we are of the opinion in principle that both manufacturers and distributors should offer repairs within the legal guarantee period. This service is already provided at Würth. It is important for us that repairs should not be equated with the purchase of a product.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Würth Group supports the Commission’s objective to ensure equal treatment of goods produced in the EU and in third countries by adapting the CBAM obligations. Of particular importance is the consideration of free allocation of EU ETS allowances, which will be phased out by 2034. Our procurement concerns mainly DIN and standard parts, which are mostly manufactured outside the EU.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Contribution to the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) Sale and repurchase of allowances The Würth Group is grateful for the opportunity to comment and would like to draw attention from business practice to aspects of the current draft that are crucial for a workable and legally certain implementation without compromising the instrument’s objective.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
The Würth Group welcomes the European Commission’s proposal to postpone the application of the battery due diligence obligations under Regulation (EU) 2023/1542 by two years. In our view, this extension is necessary and useful in order to give companies sufficient time to adapt their internal processes, supply chain structures and information flows to the new requirements.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 279.
Everything on this page comes from Adolf Würth GmbH & Co. KG’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.