Maritime transport: monitoring, reporting and verification and alignment with revisions of the EU Emissions Trading System
1 submissions from 1 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 916 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 1 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
NextFeedback on adopted proposal open: EU emissions trading system for maritime, aviation and stationary installations, and market stability reserve - review — closes 24 Oct 2026
Adoption of legislative proposal by the Commission · 17 Jul 2026
Public consultation closed: EU emissions trading system for maritime, aviation and stationary installations, and market stability reserve - review — 535 responses · 8 Jul 2025
Call for evidence closed: EU emissions trading system for maritime, aviation and stationary installations, and market stability reserve - review — 377 responses · 8 Jul 2025
Who showed up
1 submissions from industry and none from civil society organizations.
Industry 1Civil society 0Public authorities, academia, other 0
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation is open — 55 days leftto submit. It closes on 24 Oct 2026.
Responding? PolicySpeak drafts consultation responses grounded in your organization’s own positions. Request access.
In general, the Czech Republic welcomes the direction of the proposed revision of the EU ETS, which reflects some of the long-standing requirements of the Member States and the energy sector, in particular maintaining the important role of free allocation, adjusting the functioning of the MSR and easing the pace of the reduction of the cap.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.