Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation · Commission Proposal

Civil aspects of the cross-border protection of vulnerable adults

10 submissions from 9 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 59 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 10 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

1 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 7 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 1Civil society 7Public authorities, academia, other 2

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 20 Aug 2023 — it ran from 2 Jun 2023.

Policy area
Justice (DG JUST)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
Commission Proposal
Commission reference
COM(2023)281

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · impact assessment29 Mar 2022
  2. Public consultation29 Mar 2022
  3. Proposal for a regulation20 Aug 2023

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Prop dec.

Showing 10 of 10 submissions.

VF

Validity Foundation

· · filed 20 Aug 2023 · source

PDF

Validity Foundation is making this submission in response to the proposed Regulation on the protection of vulnerable adults. The proposal, in our view, fundamentally contradicts the general obligations of Member States and European Union as parties to the CRPD (Article 4 CRPD).

LinkedInX

The European Network of (Ex-)Users and Survivors of Psychiatry expresses grave concern about the proposed Regulation on protection of adults as it has the potential to spread practices outlawed by the UN CRPD such as guardianship regimes and institutionalization throughout the European Union and beyond.

LinkedInX
AP

AGE Platform Europe

· · filed 18 Aug 2023 · source

AGE Platform Europe (AGE) recognises the importance of conflict of laws legislation as a means to provide legal certainty, avoid gaps and promote the uniform application of substantive international law including in the EU.

LinkedInX
ED

European Disability Forum

· · filed 17 Aug 2023 · source

PDF

The European Disability Forum (EDF) is extremely concerned that the proposed Regulation on protection of adults does not comply with the obligations of the EU and all its Member States under the United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (CRPD), and is generally in breach with the fundamental rights of equality and autonomy applicable to every EU citizen.

LinkedInX
AE

Alzheimer Europe

· · filed 16 Aug 2023 · source

PDF

Alzheimer Europe broadly welcomes the Commissions proposals in relation to cross border arrangements for adults in need of legal support, as well as the proposal for Member States to join the HCCH 2000 Protection of Adults Convention.

LinkedInX

dear Mr/Ms, everyone who is healthy and aware of political and demographic realities can only agree with this proposal. It does not include any national preference and this aid will therefore once again be used to favour immigrants and illegal immigrants at the expense of France or the inhabitants of European countries.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
IE

Inclusion Europe

· · filed 29 Mar 2022 · source

PDF

As mentioned on several occasions, and lately in the European Disability Forum’s alternative report of the EU review by the CRPD Committee, “the disability movement is concerned that the implementation of this Convention could promote measures of substituted decision making, if it is not adequately implemented in line with the CRPD.” Inclusion Europe believes the cross-border protection of vulnerable adults’…

LinkedInX
ED

European Disability Forum

· · filed 29 Mar 2022 · source

PDF

The European Disability Forum (EDF) recognises the importance of adoption and application of conflict of laws treaties as a means to provide legal certainty, avoid gaps and promote the uniform application of substantive international law including in the EU. However, conflict of laws legislation should not lead to human rights violations of the person impacted by the measures at stake.

LinkedInX
EA

European Association of Private International Law (EAPIL)

· · filed 29 Mar 2022 · source

PDF

The European Association of Private International Law (EAPIL) is an independent and non-partisan organisation established in 2019 as a non-profit association under the law of Luxembourg with the aim of promoting the study and development of private international law.

LinkedInX
CD

Commission de droit des tutelles du barreau de Luxembourg

· · filed 29 Mar 2022 · source

Impact assessment on the Commission’s future legislative work on cross-border protection of vulnerable persons. The Court of Justice of the Luxembourg Bar took note of the call for contributions with interest. The context set out in this document is entirely consistent with the experience of lawyers working in the field of the protection of vulnerable adults in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 10 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.