It is absoletely mandatory to consider these two objectives: 1. 5G networks, Artificial Intelligence technologies and the Internet of Things raise security and privacy issues that could not be addressed only by GDPR.
UFC
University of Florence and CNIT
Academic / research · Italy
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
3
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track University in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at University of Florence and CNIT? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
University of Florence and CNIT filed 3 positions between 22 Jun 2021 and 13 May 2022, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 3 times.
2021 · 1 filed2022 · 2 filed
What they argued
Security and privacy in digital products delivered in the EU must be CE certified (as any other product) as secure and respecting data privacy. Also the last point (privacy) must be addressed by means of new disruptive technologies that by default must guarantee user data protection as GDPR alone, being only normative rules, is not sufficient even now and more in the future digital systems (6G, AI, IoT, etc.).
Security and privacy in the access to vehicle data are critical issues and must be guaranteed. All digital products dealing with vehicle data delivered in the EU must be CE certified (as any other product) as secure and respecting data privacy.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put University of Florence and CNIT next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 60.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from University of Florence and CNIT’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.