Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
SOP

SOPHYSA

Company · France

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track SOPHYSA in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at SOPHYSA? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files SOPHYSA engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from SOPHYSA or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

SOPHYSA filed 2 positions between 17 Jan 2023 and 6 Oct 2025, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here.

2023 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed

What they argued

Simplifying and reducing the burden of the rules on medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devices, and support of the European Medicines Agency for the expert panels on medical devices and the list of Union harmonisation legislationfiled 6 Oct 2025source

As a French SME operating in the medical device sector, we welcome the European Commissions initiative to simplify and streamline the EU regulatory framework for medical devices. We urgently call for measures to reduce administrative burden, enhance predictability, and foster innovation and competitiveness, while maintaining the highest standards of patient safety.

Transitional provisions for certain medical devices and in vitro diagnostic medical devicesfiled 17 Jan 2023source

This proposal is needed and is a good news,but 2 aspects need to be reviewed : Article 1(1), point (a), of the proposal extension of the validity of certificates : In some third parties' countries it is required to have certificates with valid dates it is critical for the business to have NB re-editing the Certificates with the extended dates Article 1(1), point (b), of the proposal extension of the transition…

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put SOPHYSA next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 16.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from SOPHYSA’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.