We appreciate the chance to provide comments on the new standard data protection clauses for the transfer of personal data to third countries pursuant to Article 46 GDPR. We acknowledge the great value of the updated framework, which will help companies when relying on third country transfers and hope our detailed comments may contribute to the further enhancement of the SDPC.
SE
SCOPE Europe
Industry association · Belgium · EU Transparency Register 751925529087-67
2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 140 think tanks and research institutions on this site, they rank #80 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.4
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€50K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2017
in the register since
Declares membership of
- SCOPE Europe does not have any members.
- Concerning affiliations, SCOPE administers and acts as the Monitoring Body of the EU Cloud Code of Conduct as well as…
- SCOPE Europe is a subsidiary of the German Non-Profit Organization, Selbstregulierung Informationswirtschaft (SRIW).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026).
- Register category
- Think tanks and research institutions
- Registered as
- SCOPE Europe (Self and Co-Regulation for an Optimized Policy Environment in Europe) (SCOPE Europe)
- Head office
- Brussels, Belgium
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track SCOPE in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at SCOPE Europe? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
SCOPE Europe filed 2 positions between 10 Dec 2020 and 24 Mar 2023, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2020 · 1 filed2023 · 1 filed
What they argued
Please, find the detailed joint-feedback as attachment. Following the key messages: 1. It is strongly recommended to extend the understanding of enforcement by integrating complementing tools, such as Codes of Conduct, into the evaluation by the European Commission. Codes of Conduct strongly support harmonization across Europe, by allowing for particularizing ambiguous interpretations in sector-specific manners.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put SCOPE Europe next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from SCOPE Europe’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.