Battery labels should be required to state the number of chargedischarge cycles, determined under clearly defined and standardized reference conditions. This information is particularly relevant for high-power and high-capacity batteries, such as those used in electric vehicles and industrial or stationary energy storage applications.
SAB
SABIC
Company · Netherlands · EU Transparency Register 738140415497-66
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1212 companies & groups on this site, they rank #741 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
0.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€400K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since
Declares membership of
- SABIC is among others a member of CEFIC (European Chemical Industry Council) and some of its sector groups
- Plastics Europe →
- VNCI (Dutch Chemical association)
- EPCA
- Sustainable Fuels Europe
- ECTA (European Chemical Transport Association)
- CIA
- ACC
- EBIS (European Barge Inspection Scheme)
- APPE
- ICCA
- EEPC (European Ethylene Producers Committee )
- and 3 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Registered as
- SABIC International Holdings B.V. (SABIC)
- Head office
- Amsterdam, Netherlands
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track SABIC in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at SABIC? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
SABIC filed 2 positions between 13 Jul 2022 and 22 Dec 2025, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here.
2022 · 1 filed2025 · 1 filed
What they argued
In the call for evidence the scope of high-risk chemicals is not well defined. Therefore we cannot assess the impact on our company and on chemical industry in more general terms. First proposal: provide a concise lis of chemical substances that are targeted to become in scope of a potential future regulation.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put SABIC next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from SABIC’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.