Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
POL

POLLINIS

NGO · France

3
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
3
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track POLLINIS in PolicySpeak: request access →

Follow POLLINIS

An email when this organization files on a consultation we publish.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Work at POLLINIS? so we know who speaks for it.

Their record over time

POLLINIS filed 3 positions between 3 Nov 2023 and 9 Oct 2025, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

2023 · 1 filed2025 · 2 filed

What they argued

European Biotech Actfiled 11 Jun 2025PDFsource

With regard to the use of biotechnology in agriculture, POLLINIS called for the utmost caution. These technologies are new, and we have no backsliding on their potential impacts on the environment and human health, but also more generally on their socio-economic impacts.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feedfiled 3 Nov 2023source

We disagree with the criteria for establishing equivalence between plants obtained by NGTs and conventional bred plants. These criteria were chosen arbitrarily and have no sound scientific basis. Many scientists say this, such as ENSSER that there is no scientific basis for asserting that new genetically modified plants meeting the category 1 criteria are equivalent to conventional plants…

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

Amendment of data requirements for applications for the approval of active substancesfiled 9 Oct 2025PDFsource

POLLINIS welcomes the European Commissions initiative to revise Regulation (EU) No 283/2013 and appreciates the opportunity to share its perspective on the proposed updates. We value the Commissions recognition of the need to base pesticide risk assessments on the most current scientific evidence and to apply testing methods that are both precise and sensitive.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put POLLINIS next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 23.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from POLLINIS’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.