Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2023/0226(COD) · In Force

Plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed

278 submissions from 270 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission received 3,766 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 278 from organizations. Not shown: 3,438 from private individuals. Their submissions are personal data; the Commission publishes them under its own legal basis, and republishing them by name here would need one we do not have. Organizations act in a public capacity, so their positions are public record. Also not shown: 50 further submissions we do not publish for other reasons: no quotable text (a comment under 250 characters and no readable paper), no organization named, or a private person who filed under their own name. About this data →

Committee ENVIRapporteur Jessica Polfjärd (EPP)
  1. Publication in the Official Journal · 27 Jun 2026
  2. Published in the Official Journal · 26 Jun 2026
  3. Signed · 17 Jun 2026
  4. Plenary Vote · 17 Jun 2026
  5. PLENARY_APPROVE_COUNCIL_POSITION · 17 Jun 2026

Who showed up

166 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 49 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 3.4 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 166Civil society 49Public authorities, academia, other 63

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

58 of 270
in the EU Register
242
full-time lobbying staff
€32.2M+
declared costs a year
129
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 14 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

No consultation closing date is recorded for this file.

Policy area
Health & food (DG SANTE)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Lead committee
ENVI
Commission reference
COM(2023)411

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep22 Oct 2021
  2. Public consultation22 Jul 2022
  3. Proposal for a regulation5 Nov 2023

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Communic posit.

Showing 25 of 278 submissions.

NATRUE aisbl is an international non-profit association representing pioneering producers from across the global natural and organic cosmetics (NOCs) sector, and welcomes this opportunity to provide feedback to the EU Commissions legislative proposal for plants produced by certain new genomic techniques (NGTs).

LinkedInX
NI

Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research (NIBIO) is to contribute to food security and safety, sustainable resource management, innovation and value creation through research and knowledge production within food, forestry and other biobased industries.

LinkedInX
TP

TomatoEurope Processors Association

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

Brussels, 24 October 2023 TE2317 TomatoEurope Position Paper on the New Genomic Techniques TomatoEurope represents the tomato processing industry, covering more than 95% of the European business. Active since 1979, it has acted as an umbrella organisation for national associations, indirectly representing more than 200 tomato processing entities in six European countries (France, Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal).

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
GI

GREEN-IT Bioresources for Sustainability, ITQB NOVA

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

Plant improvement is continuously needed to address the challenges and constrains faced by humankind. This is specially important given the need to minimize the use of agrochemicals. The crops we currently have available are the output of hard work from farmers, breeders and scientists, all equally important, but the challenges have increased and the work cannot stop!

LinkedInX

APROSE (Professional Association of Selecta Seed Producers representing companies in the certified seed multiplier sector in Spain) is in favour of this Commission proposal as it is based on scientific evidence establishing different rules for plants and products derived from New Genetic Techniques (NTG) compared to genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
RZ

Rijk Zwaan

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

I would like to thank and support the legislative initiatives on innovation in genetic improvement, and I am in favour of the Commission’s proposal to regulate the breeding of plants produced using new genomic techniques. This contributes to the production of new varieties and improves the sustainability of agri-food production.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AJ

ASAJA Joven

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

The adoption of new gene editing techniques allows us to move towards sustainability both economically and agronomically speaking. From the point of view of a young farmer, it allows us to improve the adaptation of crops to the soil than we have, again demonstrating the usefulness of scientific knowledge to help us become more sustainable and resilient to new changes in both climate and soil.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
DA

Danish Agriculture and Food Council

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

The Danish Agricultural and Food Council (DAFC) represent the whole value chain from plant breeders to farmers and producers of food, feed and nonfood products including organic producers. DAFC highly welcome the Commission proposal for future regulation of plants and products from these developed by new plant breeding methods within the NGT 1 category.

LinkedInX
BA

BIO AUSTRIA

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

The current legislative proposal provides for a ban on all NGTs in organic production. We believe that this provision is essential. The use of these procedures does not comply with the principles of organic farming, as is also laid down in Article 5 of Regulation (EU) 2018/848.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
SL

SEED Luxemburg

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

Neue Gentechnik würde nach Plan der EU-Kommission Sicherheitstests umgehen Luxemburg, den 20. Oktober 2023 - Am 5. Juli 2023 veröffentlichte die Europäische Kommission einen Plan zur Abschaffung der meisten Sicherheitsvorschriften für die Produktion und den Verkauf einer neuen Kategorie von gentechnisch veränderten Pflanzen, die mit Neuer Gentechnik (NGT) hergestellt wurden.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
NF

NOAH, Frøsamlerne, Biodynamisk Jordbrug

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

The 3 organisations behind the consultation response have a number of comments on the consultation. Please read in the attached file. NOAH, Foreningen for Biodynamisk Jordbrug (Danish Association for Biodynamic Agriculture), and Frøsamlerne (Danish Seed Collectors) recommend that the EU-Commissions proposal to change categories for new techniques to genetically modify plants should be dismissed (NGT1, NGT2), as…

LinkedInX
OU

Obst-und Weinbau

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

Dear ladies and gentlemen, I cannot agree to an amendment to the Genetic Engineering Ordinance (NGT plants) as a bio/demeter of operation. The reasons are as follows. Crossing with other plants cannot be avoided in the small parcels in BaWü. Proof of contamication by the polluter cannot be traced by my holding if there is no declaration or registration of sowing/cultivation.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX

The Commission, with the new NGT Regulation, proposes to establish two categories for NGT plants and their products. On the one hand, certain types of NGT plants are to be considered equivalent to conventionally bred plants, removing them from the scope of the EU GMO legislation and, on the other hand, adapting the risk assessment for other types of NGT plants based on their risk profile, remaining under the GMO…

LinkedInX
T

Toekomstboeren

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

The proposal for deregulation of the CMO as made by the EC, supplemented by an amendment to the effect that category 1 CMO is not prohibited in the organic sector is contrary to the right to freedom of choice. Deregulation of the CMO reinforces the discriminatory dominance of large companies. The UN report of 2017 states that agroecological farming should be promoted.

Filed in Dutch · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
F

FEPEX

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

FEPEX, the Spanish Federation of Associations of Producers Exporters of Fruit, Vegetables, Flores and Live Plants, welcomes the Commission’s consultation and appreciates the opportunity to comment on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and on derived food and feed.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
GI

GeneSprout Initiative

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

GeneSprout Initiative is an early-career researcher initiative dedicated to fostering an open dialogue on NGTs (New Genomic Techniques) and the EU policy surrounding them. GeneSprout Initiative welcomes the ECs proposal that will guarantee equal access of category 1 plants to the market as their conventionally bred counterparts.

LinkedInX
KP

Öko-Progressives Netzwerk e.V.

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

We welcome the European Commission’s draft regulation of New Genomic Techniques (NGTs) in plant breeding. In times of climate change and related changes in environmental conditions, rapid adaptation of crops to new biotic and abiotic factors is essential to ensure food security.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
GA

German Association for Synthetic Biology e.V.

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

We are the German Association for Synthetic Biology (GASB), and we welcome the European Commission's proposal for the new regulation of New Genomic Techniques (NGTs). Climate change is one of the most important issues in our generation and we firmly believe that NGTs can play a role in promoting sustainable agriculture and achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs) set by the United Nations.

LinkedInX
SC

Soy Canada Inc

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

Soy Canada is the national value-chain organization for the soybean sector, including seed developers, growers, exporters, and processors. Our membership is diverse, including small, medium and large businesses across the country. Innovation is at the heart of Canadas soybean growers, who have proudly produced soybeans for more than 70 years.

LinkedInX
SS

SOC SAT

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

The EU is aware of the threat of climate crisis and food insecurity, and is, in some areas, supporting a transition to agroecology, supporting small farmers, biodiversity and local production. To even contemplate the use of genetically manipulated material goes against this current and paradoxically supports industrial agriculture and the giant multinationals who will profit.

LinkedInX
SD

Sow Diverse

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

Sow Diverse is a Heirloom and rare seeds company based in Ireland. Sow Diverse strongly opposes the adoption of the proposed regulation concerning plants and seeds obtained using NTGs. The proposed deregulation would allow a large part of these new GMOs to be cultivated and placed on the European Union market without prior global assessment, without product labeling, without traceability once released, without legal…

LinkedInX
EP

European Plant Science Organisation

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

EPSO welcomes the move towards a more proportionate regulatory environment for NGT crops. EPSO acknowledges that the proposal is a balanced compromise and supports most of its content, especially the quasi-equivalence of NGT1 plants with conventionally bred ones and the omission of additional labelling requirements beyond the seed labelling.

LinkedInX
GN

GMO Network Norway

· · filed 5 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

GMO-Network Norway would like to emphasise that it is vital that all GMOs, including NGTs, undergo a thorough risk assessment and approval procedure before they can be marketed for food and/or feed use. Moreover, traceability and GMO-labelling of products produced using these techniques must guarantee consumers and food producers the right to know and freedom of choice.

LinkedInX
GA

Global Affairs Canada

· · filed 4 Nov 2023 · source

PDF

November 3, 2023 European Commission Brussels, Belgium Subject: Government of Canada Comments on the European Commission Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques and their food and feed, and amending Regulation (EU) 2017/625 To Whom It May Concern, The Government of Canada thanks the European Commission for the opportunity to submit…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

LinkedInX
WB

Weingut Brüder Dr. Becker

· · filed 4 Nov 2023 · source

Weingut Brüder Dr Becker Mainzer Str. 3-7 55278 Ludwigshöhe Germany’s comments on the Commission’s new legal framework for NGTs. We call on you to continue to maintain the labelling requirement for seeds and planting stock for NTGs. As organic wine products, we are obliged to use only GM-free seeds and plants.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 278 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.