Please find attached the position paper of NXP, in two parts, the first reviews the value of security certification from our experience. The second part discusses the possible improvement points of the CSA: - Simplification, - Unification, - Business centric, - CSA update in alignment with the reality of today, - Certification of devices, processes, systems (solutions), and people, - Development time and process.
NS
NXP Semiconductors
Company · Hungary · EU Transparency Register 898711618618-45
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 1212 companies & groups on this site, they rank #722 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
2.5
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
€500K+
declared costs / yr (floor)
1
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since
Declares membership of
- AENEAS
- Inside/ARTEMIS
- BDI
- CLEPA →
- EPoSS
- ESIA
- EUROSMART →
- FEEI
- FME →
- GSA
- High Tech NL
- ITEA
- and 7 more
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Companies & groups
- Head office
- Eindhoven, Netherlands
- EU office
- Leuven
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track NXP in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at NXP Semiconductors? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
NXP Semiconductors filed 2 positions between 18 Apr 2025 and 20 Jun 2025, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
What they argued
NXP thank you for the opportunity to provide comments to the Draft Implementing Regulation. Please find our contribution in the attached document, addressing the semiconductors listed as Products with Digital Elements in Class I, Class II, and Critical products within the Cyber Resilience Act, and the proposed Implementing Regulation.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put NXP Semiconductors next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 21.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from NXP Semiconductors’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.