Dear madam, sir Sending you the feedback of the National Geographic Institute of Belgium, targeting the definition of the HVDs. Implementing regulation Article 2.2 and 2.3 Comment: the Directive 2007/2/EC includes the geospatial part of other domains like statistics, mobility and meteorological. These articles do not reflect what is described in the Annex. (5) ‘granularity’ means the level of detail of a dataset.
NGI
National Geographic Institute of Belgium
Public authority · Belgium
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
2
positions filed
in the 687 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 687 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 687 consultation files tracked so far (60,344 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track National in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at National Geographic Institute of Belgium? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
National Geographic Institute of Belgium filed 2 positions between 21 Jun 2022 and 25 Mar 2024, across 2 of the 687 legislative files tracked here.
2022 · 1 filed2024 · 1 filed
What they argued
IGN-Belgium supports this initiative, but would like to clarify a few points that should be taken into account in the stated objectives. 1) Consider refocusing the scope of the INSPIRE Directive on environmental data, while leaving non-environmental data ( cadastral parcels and agricultural parcels, buildings, road networks, etc.) out of scope.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put National Geographic Institute of Belgium next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Turns up on the same files
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from National Geographic Institute of Belgium’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.