Public authority · Estonia
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts (staff, costs, accreditations) are not available for it.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track Ministry in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Ministry of Finance? so we know who speaks for it.
Ministry of Finance filed 5 positions between 8 Dec 2020 and 3 Jun 2026, across 5 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
ESRS 2 - We would also like to state that the continued requirement to disclose both quantitative and qualitative information on the anticipated financial effect is justified and necessary. This is important information for investors and helps to create a meaningful connection between the sustainability report and the financial report.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
1. Proposal to add to the list of exceptions list of DNSH application: 1.1. Civil protection is, by its nature and objectives, analogous to defence and security activities during emergencies, having the core mission of protecting and equipping the people; failure to explicitly mention it may lead to the provisions being applied incorrectly.
The Ministry of Finance of Finland welcomes the long-expected draft and the opportunity to comment on it. Interest in Finland towards the draft has been high and we have encouraged Finnish stakeholders to provide their own comments. Innovations and new types of business can be encouraged by providing high quality open data, free of charge, via APIs.
We very much support the Commission’s plan to organize public consultation, to inform citizens and stakeholders as well as to ensure an opportunity to provide feedback. As regards to the policy options, we would like to stress that the market effort has not yet been sufficient, therefore we would support more active role to be taken by the policy makers.
Vyjádření Ministerstva financí České republiky k počáteční analýze dopadů Evropské komise „Bankovní unie: Posouzení právního rámce týkajícího se krizového řízení bank a pojištění vkladů (BRRD/SRMR/DGSD review)“ Postup společného hodnocení/Prvotní posouzení dopadu Pravděpodobná forma iniciativy: Návrh směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady, Návrh nařízení Evropského parlamentu a rady Orientačně plánováno na: 4.
Filed in Czech · English published by the European Commission
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Ministry of Finance next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 37.
Everything on this page comes from Ministry of Finance’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.