Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
ECO

ecoDa

Other · Belgium

2
positions filed
in the 639 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 639 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 639 consultation files tracked so far (53,766 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track ecoDa in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at ecoDa? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files ecoDa engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from ecoDa or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

ecoDa filed 2 positions between 26 Feb 2020 and 2 Oct 2020, across 2 of the 639 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.

What they argued

Corporate Sustainability Due Diligencefiled 2 Oct 2020PDFsource

Given that the EC Impact Assessment on Sustainable CG is largely based on the EY related survey, ecoDa will largely focus its comments on this report. ecoDa strongly believes in the importance for companies and directors to strengthen their long-term strategies by further integrating the interests of legitimate stakeholders that make sense to their business.

Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directivefiled 26 Feb 2020PDFsource

20 February 2020 ecoDa’s Reaction to the DG Fisma’s Inception Impact Assessment on the Non-Financial Reporting Directive DG FISMA has published an Inception Impact Assessment on the Non-Financial Reporting Directive and has left it for comments by February the 27th.

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put ecoDa next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 76.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from ecoDa’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.