Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
ECE

ECEAE

NGO · Germany

2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
0
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track ECEAE in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at ECEAE? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files ECEAE engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from ECEAE or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

ECEAE filed 2 positions between 29 Oct 2021 and 14 Sept 2022, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here.

2021 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed

What they argued

EU Chemicals Strategy for sustainability - Revision of the Cosmetic Products Regulationfiled 29 Oct 2021source

Animal testing for cosmetic products is still required in some cases by ECHA. According to a recent study, 63 ingredients used solely in cosmetic products have been tested on animals after the Cosmetic Regulation ban on in vivo testing. As the intention of legislators and of EU citizens aimed to ensure that animal testing for cosmetic products is banned completely, this review should close the gaps (i.p.

European Chemicals Agency and amending regulationsfiled 14 Sept 2022source

Care should be taken to increase the acceptance of non-animal research methods for safety testing and to reduce animal testing. The wording of the laws must be clear and there must be no loopholes. Particularly in the field of testing endocrine disruptors, mixtures and polymers, care must be taken not to increase animal testing.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put ECEAE next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Turns up on the same files

Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers — not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.

Showing 5 of 14.

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from ECEAE’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.