Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Comments by International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) Our full comments can be found here: https://www.ics-shipping.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Inception-Impact-Assessment-for-the-proposed-Amendment-of-the-EU-Emissions-Trading-System-Directive-2003-87-EC-1.pdf The International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) appreciates this opportunity to comment on the Inception Impact Assessment for the proposed Amendment of the EU…
The Japanese Shipowners' Association (JSA) is strongly opposed to the EU’s intent to extend the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) to the maritime sector and introduce regional regulations which impact on international shipping. The reasons for our opposition are as attached.:
ICS welcomes revising the EU Shipping MRV Regulation in order align the EU MRV with the global IMO Data Collection System (DCS). The shipping industry is encouraged by the positive statements from the European Commission acknowledging the significant progress made by IMO Member States towards addressing GHG emissions from international shipping.
The Japanese Shipowners’ Association would welcome the European Commission to revise EU MRV regulation. Recital 34 of the EU MRV Regulation states that a global MRV system is preferable as it could be regarded as more effective due to its broader scope and that where an agreement on a global MRV system is reached the Commission should review the regulation with a view to aligning it to the global MRV system.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.