Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
ESE
European Shipowners | ECSA

Industry association · Belgium

20
files engaged
of 583 tracked
20
positions filed
in those 583 files
8.1
declared FTE
self-declared
9
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €900K+ a year · in the register since 2011

Files both filed on (2)

Monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transport · Carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport: global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transport

The Japanese Shipowners' Association · filed 27 Oct 2021 · source

The Japanese Shipowners' Association (JSA) is strongly opposed to the EU’s intent to extend the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) to the maritime sector and introduce regional regulations which impact on international shipping. The reasons for our opposition are as attached.:

European Shipowners | ECSA · filed 8 Nov 2021 · source

Even though ECSA's first preference always is an international regulation for shipping at IMO level, the sector should contribute its fair share to address the climate crisis at EU level as well. European shipowners firmly support a dedicated fund to be set up under the EU ETS to stabilise the carbon price.

Carbon dioxide emissions from maritime transport: global data collection system for ship fuel oil consumption data

The Japanese Shipowners' Association · filed 19 Jul 2017 · source

The Japanese Shipowners’ Association would welcome the European Commission to revise EU MRV regulation. Recital 34 of the EU MRV Regulation states that a global MRV system is preferable as it could be regarded as more effective due to its broader scope and that where an agreement on a global MRV system is reached the Commission should review the regulation with a view to aligning it to the global MRV system.

European Shipowners | ECSA · filed 29 Mar 2019 · source

The European Community Shipowners’ Associations (ECSA) and the International Chamber of Shipping (ICS) welcome the revision of Regulation (EU) 2015/757, thereafter the MRV Regulation, attempting to align the EU MRV with the global IMO Data Collection System (IMO DCS). ECSA nonetheless regrets that the European Commission did not opt for a full alignment with the IMO DCS.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.