Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

SCA
Swedish Consumer Agency

Public authority · Sweden

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
77
files engaged
of 583 tracked
87
positions filed
in those 583 files
15
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €2.8M+ a year · in the register since 2010

Files both filed on (2)

Discontinuation of the European ODR Platform · Reinforced consumer protection cooperation

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Discontinuation of the European ODR Platform

Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 7 Nov 2022 · source

Ladies and gentlemen, we would like to respond to the invitation to comment on the document on consumer rights adaptation of out-of-court dispute resolution to digital markets: As a preliminary point, it is necessary to counter the rather negative picture in the invitation to submit comments: In the vast majority of cases, consumer transactions work perfectly smoothly.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Swedish Consumer Agency · filed 20 Dec 2022 · source

The position of the Swedish Consumer Agency is expressed in the attached file, and can be summarised as follows: The Swedish Consumer Agency agrees that an effective system for alternative dispute resolution is important to achieve a well-functioning Single Market. Consumers are shopping across the borders which means that such system also has to function in cases of cross-border disputes.

Reinforced consumer protection cooperation

Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 7 Nov 2022 · source

Ladies and gentlemen, we would like to respond to the invitation to provide an opinion on the impact assessment on consumer protection. The level of consumer protection in the Union is already extremely high. Further burdens on the economy are strongly rejected; this is particularly important in view of the current extraordinary challenges faced by businesses.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

Swedish Consumer Agency · filed 20 Dec 2022 · source

The Swedish Consumer Agency welcomes a targeted revision of Regulation (EU) 2017/2394 on consumer protection cooperation (CPC Regulation). Overall the Regulation provides for a solid legal basis for effective cross-border consumer protection cooperation.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.