Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The Single-Use Plastics Directive (SUPD) and the associated guideline on single-use plastic products (SUP product guideline) as well as the guideline laying down criteria on the costs of cleaning up litter (cost guideline) do not meet the requirements for proper implementation in practice. A major criticism is the sole focus on litter. In practice, city cleaning does not involve litter collection, but area cleaning.
Please find attached the response from the Rethink Plastic Alliance to the call for evidence for the evaluation of the Single-Use Plastics Directive. The European Environmental Bureau (EEB) draws attention to this joint submission, which reflects the shared position of the alliance.
Nutrient-Recycling is inevitably for a sustainable nutrient management. There are already several technologies which are able to solve the problems. Also lots of new technologies and measurements are developed constantly in the EU and in the world. My feeling is, that sometimes it is not technologies, which are missing, but holistic strategies that have to be encouraged.
EEB welcomes the initiative for an EU action plan for integrated nutrient management (INMAP). The war in Ukraine has highlighted the EU’s dependency on imports of fertiliser and livestock feed, but even though our current food system is relying on limited raw materials and fossil gas, we are using these resources in a wasteful way with huge losses from field to plate.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.