Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The EU needs to cut emissions by at least 65% in 2030 to honor the Paris Agreement objective of keeping global temperature rise to 1.5°C. In order to deliver the necessary emission reductions in a socially fair and cost-effective manner, a holistic and comprehensive approach towards the entire policy architecture is needed.
In our opinion, it is recommended to phase out the free allowances for the aviation earlier than assumed in the draft amendments to the Directive 2003/87/EC It is in perfect to maintain the current level of free allowances in aviation (worth about EUR 800 million in 2019) and the proposal to phase them out by 25 % in 2024, 50 % in 2025, 75 % in 2026 and 100 % in 2027.
Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission
In light of the worsening climate crisis, the primary objective of the ETS revision is to strengthen its ambition in line with the Paris Agreement goal of limiting temperature rise to 1.5°C. This requires the EU ETS target to be increased to at least 70% emission reductions in 2030, compared to 2005 levels, in order to allow the EU to overshoot its -55% net emissions target and cut total emissions by at least 65% by…
CAN Europe welcomes the initiative of bringing the Energy Taxation Directive (ETD) and the wider EU and national taxation policies in line with the EU's climate commitments. We are strongly in favour of eliminating all subsidies and tax breaks for fossil fuels like coal, oil and gas.
We reject the proposal to levy a tax on kerosene. We believe that it would not only undermine the competitiveness of European carriers on the global market, but more importantly, it would slow down the development of the aviation sector in the EU and limit sector's ability to invest in new technologies such as alternative sustainable fuels.
The aviation sector’s emissions have been growing much faster than other sectors around the world. At the same time the sector continues benefitting from numerous privileges in the EU, ranging from free allocation of allowances under the EU ETS, exemption from fuel taxes, exemption from VAT on international flights, state aid (e.g.
On the topic of the implementation of the CORSIA regulations, we grant a full approval for the obligation to adapt the current European regulations and the provisions of individual Member States. An important element in the adaptation of the CORSIA system is the proper division of flights between two separately operating systems with the aim of reducing CO2 emissions in aviation.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.