Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
GENERAL COMMENTS: • Extension of EU ETS should not be considered as most effective solution across all sectors. Individual approach in specific sectors should be applied in order to maximize environmental benefits. • As regards waste sector, one of the main identified sources of methane are uncontrolled emissions of landfill gas in landfill sites.
ETS reform as part of a package to collectively increase climate ambition Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH) notes that even with a 2030-climate target of 55%, Europe remains off track to reach the Paris Agreement 1.5°C objective. Emission cuts of at least 65% are required for the EU to fully honor its international commitments.
GENERAL COMMENTS: • The effects of raising the contribution of the ETS towards a higher emissions reduction target will not be felt equally across the EU. Some MS will be more affected than others. • Required investment in Polish energy sector in the years 2021-2040 (according to the Polish government), are estimated at over PLN 560 bln (about EUR 125 bln). • PGNiG is concerned whether additional resources (2,5 p.p.
Immediate social concerns and unclear climate benefits Environmental Action Germany (DUH) welcomes pricing in climate damage costs in the transport and building sectors, where emissions reductions are slow at best. We are concerned, however, that the introduction of a new emissions trading system is not the right instrument.
Deutsche Umwelthilfe (DUH) would like to stress that currently, the EED, like the other elements of the Clean Energy for All package, are inconsistent with the ambition of the Paris Agreement, as action in the next 10 years will be decisive in reaching the 1.5°C objective. We fully support the initiative to revise the EED and stresses that the ambition level needs to increase significantly.
GENERAL COMMENTS: • PGNiG highlights that some Member States due to national circumstances (e.g. Poland) still rely heavily on coal. PGNiG is actively involved in transformation of district heating by replacing coal plants with natural gas-fired high efficiency cogeneration units.
Strengthening of the Energy Efficiency Directive DUH is calling for the adoption of a binding energy efficiency target of at least 45 % in the year 2030 (compared to the EU Reference Scenario 2007 or of at least 20 % in 2030 compared to the EU reference scenario 2020). This will help to achieve the 1.5°C target of the Paris Agreement, improve the energy security of the EU, create jobs, and reduce pollution.
The car CO2 standards represent the primary EU policy instrument driving the transition to zero-emission road transport. Current standards are not in line with the Paris Agreement, and several elements of the regulation limit its effectiveness. These shortcomings must now be addressed, and the overall ambition significantly increased to set road transport on a rapid path to zero emissions within the next few years.
PGNiG welcomes the possibility to comment on the proposal for a regulation amending Regulation 2019/631 as regards strengthening the CO2 emission performance standards for new passenger cars and new light commercial vehicles in line with the Union’s increased climate ambition (Cars Regulation).
DUH welcomes the opportunity to submit feedback on the European Commission (EC) proposal for revised car CO2 standards. Road transport emissions have been rising over the last 30 years. Without fast and significant reductions in passenger car emissions, the EU won’t be able to meet its own climate targets, let alone the 1.5°C limit.
Environmental Action Germany welcomes the opportunity to comment on this EC initiative. We wish to make the following comments: 1. Crop biofuels are more damaging to the climate than fossil fuels. Crop biofuels must be phased out entirely and must not be incentivised for use in shipping. 2. Advanced biofuels based on wastes and residues are not automatically sustainable.
General comments: • The Council of the European Union recognised the need to support the development of different alternative fuels (including LNG as a transitional fuel). • As stated in the Impact Assessment accompanying the proposal for regulation, LNG provides a good solution to air pollution issues, allowing reductions in SOx and NOx emissions.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.