Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

MOT
MOTUS-E

Industry association · Italy

4
files engaged
of 583 tracked
6
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
ACE
ACEA

Industry association · Belgium

46
files engaged
of 583 tracked
55
positions filed
in those 583 files
19.5
declared FTE
self-declared
11
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €5.5M+ a year · in the register since 2008

Files both filed on (3)

Revision of EU rules on public procurement · Batteries and waste batteries · Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Revision of EU rules on public procurement

MOTUS-E · filed 23 Jan 2026 · source

A key point that Motus-E would like to convey concerns the classification of ZEVs. In this respect, we note that the Commissions proposal for the revision of the CO Regulation introduces a pragmatic approach whereby zero-emission vehicles of category N may be counted as light commercial vehicles when the reference mass minus the mass of the energy storage system remains below 2840 kg.

ACEA · filed 26 Jan 2026 · source

ACEA is the voice of the European auto industry representing 17 major car, truck, van and bus makers. ACEA welcomes the Commissions aim to use public procurement to accelerate decarbonisation and strengthen industrial resilience. Our submission addresses the potential use of made in the EU requirements for the heavy duty vehicle segment.

Batteries and waste batteries

MOTUS-E · filed 8 Jul 2020 · source

The new regulatory framework should address the current market needs in order to ensure an efficient batteries’ life cycle management, both from an environmental and economic point of view. From this perspective and as highlighted during the consultation activities, here is what we recommend regarding: extended producer responsibility for second-life, battery recycling, battery design and manufacturing.

ACEA · filed 9 Jul 2020 · source

ACEA believes that any collection target would be inefficient to recycle more batteries. Therefore no changes are necessary to the actual legislation.Efficient and well-working collection and recycling processes, not only for automotive batteries and traction batteries, but for vehicles as such, are already implemented in many Member States.

MOTUS-E · filed 26 Feb 2021 · source

Motus-E welcomes the European Commission’s Regulation Proposal and fully supports the measures that aim to ensure a competitive, circular, sustainable and safe value chain for all batteries placed on the internal Union Market, overcoming the barriers to the functioning of recycling industry and the environmental problems related to the production, use and End-of-Life management of batteries.

Deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure

ACEA · filed 27 Apr 2020 · source

In line with the overall contribution to the Green Deal implementation published by ACEA on 22 January (https://www.acea.be/publications/article/paving-the-way-to-carbon-neutral-transport-10-point-plan-to-help-imple), automobile industry considers investment into alternative fuels infrastructure absolutely essential and the proposal on the AFID review should be presented by the Commission even sooner than foreseen…

MOTUS-E · filed 1 May 2020 · source

MOTUS-E welcomes the initiative of the Commission to evaluate the Directive 2014/94/EU. We believe the current provisions fail to support the goals of establishing a common framework of measures to mitigate the environmental impact of transport, since many of the alternative fuels allowed in the present release emit CO2 and some of them are pure or derivate fossil fuels.

MOTUS-E · filed 16 Nov 2021 · source

Motus-e strongly welcomes the European Commission’s Proposal for a Regulation and fully supports the measures that aim to deploy alternative fuels infrastructure as a necessary instrument to reduce emissions from the transport sector in the long term in the European Union.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.