Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Files both filed on (2)

Cyber Resilience Act · Evaluation of the Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) and the Simple Pressure Vessels Directive (SPVD)

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Cyber Resilience Act

TÜV-Verband e. V. · filed 24 May 2022 · source

The TÜV Association welcomes the Commission’s intention of establishing binding cybersecurity requirements for a broad range of products and services. To date, the EU is lacking an all-encompassing approach to cybersecurity. Cybersecurity provisions in current legislation are either limited to specific product groups or are only applicable on a voluntary basis.

TÜV-Verband e. V. · filed 2 Dec 2022 · source

The TÜV Association welcomes the European Commissions intention of establishing binding cybersecurity requirements for a broad range of connected products with digital elements. Given the ever-increasing number of cybersecurity incidents across the Union, it is of paramount importance to provide consumers and businesses with secure products both at the time of purchase and over their entire lifecycle.

Knorr-Bremse SfS GmbH · filed 20 Jan 2023 · source

Knorr-Bremse Systeme für Schienenfahrzeuge GmbH welcomes the European Commissions work for a comprehensive ruleset enhancing cyber resilience in concept. The view on products with digital elements is an essential step in recognizing the connected and digital characteristics of future industrialization.

Evaluation of the Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) and the Simple Pressure Vessels Directive (SPVD)

TÜV-Verband e. V. · filed 19 Jun 2024 · source

The TÜV Association welcomes the European Commission's intention to evaluate the Pressure Equipment Directive 2014/68/EU (PED) and the Simple Pressure Vessels Directive 2014/29/EU (SPVD). The SPVD has not been assessed since 1987, while the PED was last assessed in 2012 and then merely adapted to the new legal framework. Directives 2014/29/EU and 2014/68/EU have proven their worth in practice.

Knorr-Bremse SfS GmbH · filed 20 Jun 2024 · source

We refer to Pressure Equipment Directive (PED) 2014/68/EU. The PED regulates the safety and conformity of pressure equipment within the European Union. Article 1, paragraph 2 of the PED specifies that certain pressure equipment is excluded from the application of the directive. Railway vehicles and their pressurized components fall under these specific exemptions.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.