Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
We applaud the increased climate ambitions of the Union, but we have to emphasise that setting a goal of climate neutrality by 2050 still is to take unacceptable risks. Emissions have to stop much earlier. The consequences of being wrong about how high atmospheric CO2 levels can be before irreversible effects set in are Catastrophic. EU climate policy should follow the precise principle (cf.
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
The EU needs to cut emissions by at least 65% in 2030 to honor the Paris Agreement objective of keeping global temperature rise to 1.5°C. In order to deliver the necessary emission reductions in a socially fair and cost-effective manner, a holistic and comprehensive approach towards the entire policy architecture is needed.
In light of the worsening climate crisis, the primary objective of the ETS revision is to strengthen its ambition in line with the Paris Agreement goal of limiting temperature rise to 1.5°C. This requires the EU ETS target to be increased to at least 70% emission reductions in 2030, compared to 2005 levels, in order to allow the EU to overshoot its -55% net emissions target and cut total emissions by at least 65% by…
The aviation sector’s emissions have been growing much faster than other sectors around the world. At the same time the sector continues benefitting from numerous privileges in the EU, ranging from free allocation of allowances under the EU ETS, exemption from fuel taxes, exemption from VAT on international flights, state aid (e.g.
Option 1 (“full legal scope for the EU ETS”) is the best of the proposed option. CORSIA does not reduce CO2 emissions at all but only future climate compensation. The damage is already distorted, the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased with all the disastrous consequences it will entail. Climate compensation does not prevent these consequences.
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
We welcome immediate actions to reduce Europe’s dependency on Russian fossil fuels in the face of its aggression against Ukraine. However, the EC’s proposal falls short in mobilising sufficient additional finance at the EU level and puts at risk the achievement of key environmental objectives.
We are concerned about this proposal, as it sends the wrong signal as to the Union’s determination in the transition to a zero-emission economy. Allowing investment in new fossil energy infrastructure would lead to an inherent conflict of objectives in REPowerEU. The initiative aims to reduce dependence on fossil energy and diversify energy supply.
Filed in Swedish · English published by the European Commission
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.
