Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

3
files engaged
of 583 tracked
3
positions filed
in those 583 files
0.5
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €100K+ a year · in the register since 2013

77
files engaged
of 583 tracked
87
positions filed
in those 583 files
15
declared FTE
self-declared
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €2.8M+ a year · in the register since 2010

Files both filed on (2)

Limit values for lead and its inorganic compounds and diisocyanates · Protection of workers from asbestos

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Limit values for lead and its inorganic compounds and diisocyanates

Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 16 Mar 2022 · source

WKÖ Draft Input on Roadmaps for revised OELs for lead and diisocyanates We welcome the opportunity to voice our opinion and concerns on the occasion of the call for evidence for an impact assessment on a proposal for a Directive on protecting workers from exposure to chemicals (lead and di-isocyanates).

Institution of Occupational Safety and Health · filed 21 Mar 2022 · source

IOSH welcomes this inquiry that looks to assess the work-related health risks of occupational workplace exposure to chemicals, from lead and its compounds and di-isocyanate exposure. To complete our response an additional evidence-based document has been provided highlighting the existing gaps and challenges. This response focuses on the recommendations on improvements to the Chemical Agents Directive (CAD).

Protection of workers from asbestos

Wirtschaftskammer Österreich · filed 16 Mar 2022 · source

WKÖ Draft Input on Roadmap for revised OEL for asbestos We welcome the opportunity to voice our opinion and concerns on the occasion of the call for evidence for an impact assessment on a proposal for a Directive on protecting workers from asbestos exposure.

Institution of Occupational Safety and Health · filed 22 Mar 2022 · source

Recommendations We are conscious that reviewing or developing regulations for managing asbestos in the workplace -while necessary-, will not solely provide the solution to this occupational issue. In addition to asbestos not being in general use in the EU, this needs to be encompassed by a set of measures, including prioritising substitution of carcinogenic substances in the authorisation and restriction processes…

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.