Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

IKE
IKEA

Company · Sweden

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Files both filed on (2)

Accounting of greenhouse gas emissions of transport services · General Product Safety Regulation

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Accounting of greenhouse gas emissions of transport services

IKEA · filed 8 Dec 2021 · source

It is a fact that the logistics and distribution business lacks a frame that let measure, monitor, and compare solutions and operations, as well as address the correct actions to address the sustainable goals, which use to be represented within the strategic goals of the majority of the organisations in the sector.

TÜV-Verband e. V. · filed 14 Nov 2023 · source

Measuring greenhouse gas emissions is a key tool to drive sustainability, innovation and behavioural change and is already being used in various sectors of the economy. In the transport sector, there is not yet a generally accepted framework for measuring greenhouse gas emissions from different transport services.

Filed in German · English published by the European Commission

General Product Safety Regulation

TÜV-Verband e. V. · filed 6 Aug 2020 · source

Unfortunately, the initial revision with commission proposal of 2013 was not successful and a missed opportunity. The GPSD needs now even more a fundamental revision to align its provisions with the goods package from 2008 and to update its safety requirements to new developments in markets, distribution channels and technology (security and privacy aspects). We therefore recommend Option 3.

IKEA · filed 1 Sept 2020 · source

IKEA recommend revising the General Product Safety Directive with the intent of transforming the Directive into a Regulation. The scope of the regulation should remain limited to the safety of non-harmonised consumer products, while updates should be made to promote harmonised enforcement and efficient recalls. Please refer to the attached file for the rational behind our recommendations.

TÜV-Verband e. V. · filed 4 Oct 2021 · source

The TÜV Association welcomes the Commission’s intention to undertake the existing General Product Safety Directive (2001/95/EC) a substantial revision. Products must be safe and consumers have to rely on their safety. The Commission proposal is clearly a step in the right direction. However, further improvements are needed. Please find our feedback attached.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.