Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
It is a fact that the logistics and distribution business lacks a frame that let measure, monitor, and compare solutions and operations, as well as address the correct actions to address the sustainable goals, which use to be represented within the strategic goals of the majority of the organisations in the sector.
BEUC is supportive of the objective of this initiative. However, some principles need to be guaranteed to bring real benefits to consumers: - The methodology should be based on sound scientific evidence and real-world emissions; - The methodology (and the way it is communicated to consumers) should focus on absolute greenhouse gas emissions.
Following our initial feedback, BEUC would like to raise new elements: BEUC's main concern is the way in which the data from the methodology will be presented to consumers. In our view, article 9.3 leaves the door open to "disguising" the raw data by stating "the output data as a minimum shall consist total mass of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) per transport service, and, in relation to a type of transport…
BEUC strongly welcomes the announcement of the European Commission to review the General Product Safety Directive. We agree to the problem definition as outlined in the roadmap which emphasises the challenges posed by new technologies, e-commerce and a fragmented legislative framework for market surveillance.
IKEA recommend revising the General Product Safety Directive with the intent of transforming the Directive into a Regulation. The scope of the regulation should remain limited to the safety of non-harmonised consumer products, while updates should be made to promote harmonised enforcement and efficient recalls. Please refer to the attached file for the rational behind our recommendations.
BEUC strongly supports the draft for a General Product Safety Regulation. We agree on the objectives and welcome: • The underlined value of the safety net function and precautionary principle • Coherent market surveillance rules between harmonised and non-harmonised products as well as the new tools given to Member States • Stronger traceability in the supply chain and a greater responsibility for safety of online…
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.