Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

HT
Huawei Technologies

Company · CHN

5
files engaged
of 583 tracked
5
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
CLE
CLEPA

Industry association · Belgium

37
files engaged
of 583 tracked
39
positions filed
in those 583 files
3.8
declared FTE
self-declared
12
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €800K+ a year · in the register since 2011

Files both filed on (3)

A high common level of cybersecurity · Liability for defective products · Intelligent Road Transport Systems

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

A high common level of cybersecurity

CLEPA · filed 17 Mar 2021 · source

CLEPA – European Association of Automotive Suppliers and ACEA – European Automobile Manufacturers Association welcome the opportunity to provide feedback on the Commission’s proposal for a Directive on high common level of cybersecurity across the Union (NIS 2 Directive). The proposal is timely and an important initiative to address the emerging threats to the European Digital Single Market.

Huawei Technologies · filed 18 Mar 2021 · source

As a leading provider of computing and connectivity solutions for European companies, the security of ICT infrastructures and services of our consumers is the most important concern of Huawei operations in Europe.

Liability for defective products

CLEPA · filed 23 Jul 2021 · source

CLEPA supports the goal of modernising liability rules to account for new technologies such as AI. However, any liability framework should strike a balance between efficiently protecting victims of damage while also granting leeway for the development of new technologies, services, and products.

Huawei Technologies · filed 28 Jul 2021 · source

Huawei welcomes the debate relating to artificial intelligence and the potential update of the relevant legislative framework. We are generally in favour of a stronger harmonization of the liability framework in the EU as it may help to spur investment in AI and improve Europe’s competitiveness in the global market.

Intelligent Road Transport Systems

Huawei Technologies · filed 10 Feb 2022 · source

Huawei welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on the Commission's proposal for revision of the ITS Directive. We consider that the EU regulatory framework should be conducive to European competitiveness and foster the development of innovative business models. As such, the participation and added value of different stakeholders, both public and private, should be duly taken into consideration.

CLEPA · filed 20 Mar 2022 · source

CLEPA’s comments to the revised C-ITS Directive CLEPA, the European Association of Automotive Suppliers, appreciates the Commission’s intention to accelerate the deployment of ITS services. With the proposal of the revised Directive on Intelligent Transport Services (ITS Directive) an improved framework is provided but benefits for consumers will emerge as soon as intermodal and European wide Mobility services are…

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.