Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

5
files engaged
of 583 tracked
5
positions filed
in those 583 files
1.5
declared FTE
self-declared
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2011

DIG
DIGITALEUROPE

Industry association · Belgium

67
files engaged
of 583 tracked
78
positions filed
in those 583 files
26.7
declared FTE
self-declared
26
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €3.5M+ a year · in the register since 2011

Files both filed on (3)

Digital Networks Act · Common rules promoting the repair of goods · Application of Article 3 (3) (i) and 4 of Directive 2014/53/EU relating to Reconfigurable Radio Systems

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Digital Networks Act

DIGITALEUROPE · filed 11 Jul 2025 · source

Europes ambition to lead in connectivity is being held back by a regulatory framework that no longer matches the realities of todays digital infrastructure. As the Commission explores reform through the upcoming Digital Networks Act (DNA), it is time to move towards a simplified, harmonised and investment-focused model.

Free Software Foundation Europe e.V. · filed 18 Feb 2026 · source

Free Software Foundation Europe’s feedback on the proposed “Digital Networks Act” February 2026 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.............................................................................................2 The FSFE calls for strong and consistent protection of Router Freedom..............3 Fragmented regulatory framework..................................................................4 European…

Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)

DIGITALEUROPE · filed 10 Jun 2026 · source

DIGITALEUROPE welcomes the proposed Digital Networks Act (DNA) and supports its objective of delivering a more harmonised, simplified and investment-friendly connectivity framework across the European Union. The transition from a Directive to a Regulation is a positive step towards reducing fragmentation and enabling greater scale in Europe's connectivity market.

Common rules promoting the repair of goods

Free Software Foundation Europe e.V. · filed 5 Apr 2022 · source

The Free Software Foundation Europe is a charity that empowers users to control technology. For a more sustainable consumption of good, promoting repair and reuse we developed the following policy recommendation: • End-users should have the right to freely choose operating systems and software running on their devices; • End-users should have the right to freely choose between service providers to connect their…

DIGITALEUROPE · filed 5 Apr 2022 · source

DIGITALEUROPE believes that consumers should be entitled to high-quality repairs that are safe, secure and reliable. Our members already treat repair, refurbishment and remanufacturing as part of their everyday business practice, performing millions of repairs annually.

DIGITALEUROPE · filed 15 May 2023 · source

The proposed Right to Repair Directive creates a positive new framework to enable more European consumers to access high-quality, safe repairs. Our members perform millions of repairs annually. Their repair facilities across Europe help promote sustainable consumption, reduce ICT products environmental impact, deliver real consumer benefits, and create high-skilled jobs.

Application of Article 3 (3) (i) and 4 of Directive 2014/53/EU relating to Reconfigurable Radio Systems

Free Software Foundation Europe e.V. · filed 4 Mar 2019 · source

The Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) would like to thank the European Commission for asking for public feedback. Since 2011, the FSFE has been working to protect and enhance freedoms of technology users in Europe. Therefore, we are pleased to provide our expertise for the matter of Article 3(3)(i).

DIGITALEUROPE · filed 4 Mar 2019 · source

DIGITALEUROPE believes that this initiative should only be limited to classes of radio equipment for which there is a clear evidence showing that the upload of software on radio equipment could lead to a serious risk of non compliance in the EU market. So far, problems causing a risk of non-compliance with the RED due to software uploads have not been clearly identified.

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.