Side by side
Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Company · France
Industry association · Belgium
Declared costs: €500K+ a year · in the register since 2014
Evaluation of the Fertilising Products Regulation · Digital labelling of EU fertilising products
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
Fertilisants Germiflor · filed 23 Jun 2025 · source
Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 was intended to simplify access to the European fertilising products market. In practice, its implementation has been transformed into an excessively complex system, particularly penalising organic and organo-mineral fertilisers incorporating animal by-products (ABP).
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
European Biostimulants Industry Council (EBIC) · filed 19 Sept 2025 · source
The European Biostimulants Industry Council (EBIC) acknowledges the huge benefits brought by the Fertilising Products Regulation (FPR) [Regulation (EU) 2019/1009] through the inclusion of plant biostimulants in its scope, by establishing Product Function Category 6 (PFC 6) according to the function(s) of plant biostimulants, and by allowing plant biostimulants to access the Single Market under harmonised rules.
Fertilisants Germiflor · filed 11 May 2023 · source
Good morning. The principle is well overall. However, I find it aberrant to use digital labelling, even though it is necessary to print information on the packaging or affix a NFC or other chip which will be complicated to reprocess for selective sorting. Or a code that can erase and see access for useless digital etiquettes. This is a double investment for manufacturers.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
European Biostimulants Industry Council (EBIC) · filed 26 May 2023 · source
EBIC welcomes the Commission proposal on optional digital labelling. EBIC calls for the introduction of a criterion for professional users versus non-professional users, so that digitisation for products intended for professional users can become a reality. As it stands, the proposal on digital labelling does not go far enough, and most EBIC members would not invest in creating digital labels.
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.