Side by side
Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
NGO · Belgium
Other · Belgium
Declared costs: not declared · in the register since 2014
Emergency measures for Latvia, Lithuania and Poland · Asylum and migration management
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
ECRE · filed 1 Feb 2022 · source
ECRE does not support the measures proposed, which will have an adverse effect on the right to asylum without adequately responding to the situation at the EU’s borders with Belarus. The main fundamental rights affected by the proposal are the right to human dignity (Article 1 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFREU)), the right to asylum (Article 18 CFREU), the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading…
Red Cross EU Office · filed 3 Feb 2022 · source
The Red Cross EU Office (RCEU) represents the 27 National Red Cross Societies in the European Union, the Norwegian Red Cross, the Icelandic Red Cross and the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC). We hereby wish to share our serious humanitarian concerns on the impact of this proposal on the dignity and rights of migrants in the countries concerned.
ECRE · filed 11 Mar 2021 · source
Like Dublin IV before it, the overall approach of the Regulation on asylum and migration management (RAMM) to responsibility allocation is to maintain the status quo but add “corrective” solidarity mechanisms intended to compensate for the outcomes of the standard rules and make them fairer. A deeper overhaul of the criteria on sharing of responsibility is vital to address the system’s dysfunctionalities.
Red Cross EU Office · filed 31 Aug 2021 · source
In terms of criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible, the Red Cross EU Office observers that despite the shortcomings of the Dublin system, the Pact does not propose removing the obligation for asylum seekers to remain in the country where their application was first registered.
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.