Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The ETS should remain a core policy instrument to establish CO2 abatement at the lowest practicable cost to society. We do not favor inclusion of other sectors such as transport and buildings as an extension of the ETS current scheme, which already has to cope with different sectors with distinct elasticities, and risks on carbon leakage in one system.
The Dutch Platform Renewable Fuels welcomes the extension of the ETS to include road transport and the maritime sector. It provides a clear path towards a net zero, climate neutral 2050. In particular we support the proposed reduction path that sets an inevitable over years decreasing ceiling for the deployment of fossil fuels.
Sustainable Fuels welcomes the opportunity to provide its input for the call for evidence and looks forward to continuing the conversation with the European Commission on the renewable energy content of ethers and in particular ETBE. We have uploaded our position statement as part of our submission.
we welcome to input on the call for evidence for the impact assessment for the RED 4. Our input will focus on the transport framework. We would like to forward our analysis about the role of renewable electricity that will reduce the volumes of renewable liquid and gaseous fuels, but not the fossil fuels volumes. Therefore RED 4 needs to pull electrons and molecules apart.
Consultation Response April 2026 The Future of the Renewable Energy Directive Chemical Industry Views Persistent high energy and feedstock costs have reached an unsustainable level for the chemical industry. As the largest industrial energy & feedstock consumer in the EU (1193 TWh, 2023), the high costs compared to other regions present an existential challenge.
Opening of the attached position paper · the full paper is on the Commission’s record (source link above)
APAG welcomes the revision of the Renewable Energy Directive (RED) in the context of the post-2030 framework. To ensure coherence with circular economy objectives and the European Green Deal, the revised framework must maintain a level playing field between competing uses of biomass, including biofuels and bio-based chemicals.
The Dutch Platform Renewable Fuels much appreciates the ‘Fit for 55’ proposals on the effects these will have on reducing the climate impact of the energy use in the international maritime sector. The Platform considers the focus of the proposed FuelEU Maritime Regulation rightly placed on reducing the climate impact, with a much-valued long-term horizon.
•The European Oleochemicals & Allied Products Group (APAG) welcomes the Commission’s proposal for the FuelEU Maritime Regulation. As we fully support the European Union’s intention to reduce emissions from shipping and would support a more ambitious approach on biofuels, modeled after the Renewable Energy Directive, including: 1.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.