Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The European Banking Federation (EBF) welcomes the European Commission’s initiative to address the issues with regard to large online platforms with significant network effects acting as gatekeepers and welcomes the opportunity to respond to the published Inception Impact Assessment (IIA) on a possible ex-ante regulatory instrument.
The Counter Extremism Project (CEP) is an international, nonprofit policy organisation engaged in efforts to regulate social media and video sharing companies since 2015. Our focus lies on extremist ideologies and illegal and terrorist content online. CEP advisors have been working with EU institutions and EU Member States for the past several years on some of the key issues the DSA aims to regulate.
“Counter Extremism Project (CEP) and Berlin Risk have co-authored the policy paper, "Further Development of European Union Regulatory Framework for Cryptocurrencies necessary to Mitigate Risks of Terrorism Financing”.
Filed in German · English published by the European Commission
Dear Sir/Madam, Please find enclosed a word (light) version of "LIFTING THE SPELL OF DIRTY MONEY", EBF BLUEPRINT FOR AN EFFECTIVE EU FRAMEWORK TO FIGHT MONEY LAUNDERING A full pdf version is available at: https://www.ebf.eu/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/EBF-Blueprint-for-an-effective-EU-framework-to-fight-money-laundering-Lifting-the-Spell-of-Dirty-Money-.pdf Best regards, [name removed]
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.