Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The Industrial Accelerator Act (IAA) has the potential to strengthen European green industry and create opportunities for Danish companies to supply green technologies while reducing unfair competition from third countries. Danish Chamber of Commerce supports this objective, particularly in light of geopolitical risks and Europes dependencies on external suppliers.
For comments from China Chamber of International Commerce("CCOIC"), please refer to the attachments. Below are CCOIC's basic positions in its comments: The CCOIC understands that there exists a certain rationality in the European Union's policy objectives to promote the clean technology industry, enhance supply chain resilience, stimulate employment, and elevate industrial competitiveness.
The Danish Chamber of Commerce supports the efforts to avoid distortions in the single market as a result of foreign subsidies. There is a real need to adress these issues. EU member states are subject to very strict regulation, that only as an exception allows state aid for European businesses.
We are of the view that the key defined term of foreign subsidies under the Proposal is too broad and ambiguous, making the discretion of the agency too wide, capturing overbroad and unnecessarily scope of activities even beyond the legislative purpose, and would likely create regulatory tools that are inconsistent with those applicable to “pure” EU undertakings, thereby discriminating undertakings originated from…
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.