Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The Ceramists’ Association of Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CBFC) comprises around sixty members whose professional activity is ceramics in all its forms: Sculpture, utility object, traditional pottery, contemporary creation, etc. These are exclusively artisanal workshops with a human size of one or two people.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
Food Contact Additives (FCA), a Sector Group of the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic), welcomes the opportunity to provide input to the Inception Impact Assessment (IIA) on the revision of EU rules on food contact materials (FCMs).
CES – Silicones Europe, a sector group of the European Chemical Industry Council (Cefic) representing all major producers of silicones in Europe, welcomes the opportunity to provide comments on the Inception Impact Assessment (IIA) for the revision of EU rules on food contact materials (FCMs) and supports the objective of this initiative.
DEAR European Commission, On behalf of the Polish Pellet Council, we would like to thank the European Commission for the opportunity to participate in the public consultation on the draft amendments to Annexes V and VI of the Renewable Energy Directive (RED III).
Filed in Polish · English published by the European Commission
APAG supports the Commissions review of Annexes V and VI and the reliance on the JRCs scientific expertise. At the same time, APAG calls for a clear and explicit limitation of the proposed animal fats pathway values to Category 1 and Category 2 animal fats only; and careful consideration of policy coherence and market impacts when revising GHG accounting rules.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.