Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

ASG
ASGI

NGO · Italy

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
7
files engaged
of 583 tracked
8
positions filed
in those 583 files
8.8
declared FTE
self-declared
5
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Declared costs: €1.3M+ a year · in the register since 2010

Files both filed on (2)

Emergency measures for Latvia, Lithuania and Poland · Asylum and migration management

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Emergency measures for Latvia, Lithuania and Poland

ASGI · filed 23 Dec 2021 · source

ASGI considers that the situation at the border with Belarus can be addressed in full compliance with international law and Union law, as currently regulated by the Asylum Directives. The current legal framework, if properly implemented, already provides adequate tools to react to an increase in asylum applications in full respect of the rights of applicants for protection.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM) · filed 3 Feb 2022 · source

PICUM is extremely concerned by the impact on the rule of law in the EU as well as on migrants’ fundamental rights of the Commission’s proposal for a Council Decision establishing provisional measures for the benefit of Latvia, Lithuania and Poland. We are alarmed by the procedure through which this file has been proposed, as well as the contents of the proposal.

Asylum and migration management

Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM) · filed 22 Mar 2021 · source

The Return Sponsorship scheme The proposed “return sponsorship” scheme raises more questions than answers. Firstly, the unclear division of responsibilities between the “sponsoring” state and the “benefitting” state risks creating legal gaps in accountability as well as serious breaches of fundamental rights.

ASGI · filed 4 Oct 2021 · source

With its proposal for a Regulation on the management of asylum and migration (COM (2020) 610), the Commission introduces into EU law a series of mechanisms and rules designed to establish a common framework for the management of asylum and migration and to establish solidarity mechanisms.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.