Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← The ranking

Side by side

Compare organizations

Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

ASG
ASGI

NGO · Italy

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
ECR
ECRE

NGO · Belgium

2
files engaged
of 583 tracked
2
positions filed
in those 583 files
declared FTE
self-declared
EP accreditations
as declared to the register

Files both filed on (2)

Emergency measures for Latvia, Lithuania and Poland · Asylum and migration management

Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.

What each said, in their own words

Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.

Emergency measures for Latvia, Lithuania and Poland

ASGI · filed 23 Dec 2021 · source

ASGI considers that the situation at the border with Belarus can be addressed in full compliance with international law and Union law, as currently regulated by the Asylum Directives. The current legal framework, if properly implemented, already provides adequate tools to react to an increase in asylum applications in full respect of the rights of applicants for protection.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

ECRE · filed 1 Feb 2022 · source

ECRE does not support the measures proposed, which will have an adverse effect on the right to asylum without adequately responding to the situation at the EU’s borders with Belarus. The main fundamental rights affected by the proposal are the right to human dignity (Article 1 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights (CFREU)), the right to asylum (Article 18 CFREU), the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading…

Asylum and migration management

ECRE · filed 11 Mar 2021 · source

Like Dublin IV before it, the overall approach of the Regulation on asylum and migration management (RAMM) to responsibility allocation is to maintain the status quo but add “corrective” solidarity mechanisms intended to compensate for the outcomes of the standard rules and make them fairer. A deeper overhaul of the criteria on sharing of responsibility is vital to address the system’s dysfunctionalities.

ASGI · filed 4 Oct 2021 · source

With its proposal for a Regulation on the management of asylum and migration (COM (2020) 610), the Commission introduces into EU law a series of mechanisms and rules designed to establish a common framework for the management of asylum and migration and to establish solidarity mechanisms.

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

Take this comparison with you

2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.