Consultation participation and their own register declarations, side by side. Counts, not judgments — participation is not influence.
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Register facts self-declared (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors. Shared files are shared attention, not evidence of coordination.
What each said, in their own words
Their opening passages on the files they share, verbatim and in filing order. We do not summarize, compare, or characterize positions — read them at source.
The Call for Evidence does not provide sufficient detail on the magnitude of the problems identified or the concrete proposals under consideration. Respondents are asked to consider the impact of policy initiatives, but the initiatives and policy direction under consideration are unclear, making it difficult to provide meaningful feedback.
For further inquiries: [name removed], Chairman Austrian Financial and Insurance Professionals Association, AFPA Albertgasse 35/1, 1080 Wien tel: [phone removed] email: [email removed] www.afpa.at AFPA, founded in 2011, is the independent industry association of Austria's self-employed insurance intermediaries and financial advisors and a member of the European industry association FECIF, based in Brussels.
Insurance Europe supports the goal of the Retail Investment Strategy (RIS) to increase retail participation in financial markets, while protecting investors from unfair practices. Within a well-designed legislative framework, insurance-based investment products (IBIPs) are key to enabling consumers to invest with confidence in capital markets, access insurance protection and prepare for old age.
Open finance, if designed with the right framework, has the potential to positively impact both consumers and insurers. However, it is important to get the framework right, so that the potential can truly be achieved. This raises important considerations in relation to consent management, the scope of the data sharing and ensuring a level playing field among market participants.
We would like to share our feedback on the consultation on the Open Finance Framework. We have included our comments in the separate attachment. Thank you very much for your consideration. We are happy to engage in a dialogue and provide further input and support.
Take this comparison with you
2 organizations on one sheet: every file each filed on, their register declarations, and a working link to each submission. Free: we ask for your name and email, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product (privacy policy). The per-file record stays downloadable without signing up on each file’s page.