Industry association · Spain · EU Transparency Register 430615914640-02
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Among the 1519 trade and business associations on this site, they rank #846 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track AEPLA in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at AEPLA? so we know who speaks for it.
AEPLA filed 3 positions between 30 Mar 2023 and 3 Nov 2023, across 3 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
AEPLA, the Business Association for the Protection of Plants – welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback to the EC public consultation on the Revision of the Regulation on Classification, Labelling and Packaging of Substances and Mixtures (CLP) From the Plant Health Sector, we would like to highlight that chemicals legislation in Europe is one of the most stringent and complex in the world, thus ensuring very…
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
AEPLA (Business Association for Plant Protection) is grateful for the opportunity to participate in the consultation on the proposal for a regulation on plants obtained by certain new genomic techniques (NTG) launched by the European Commission.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
The creation of a supplementary unitary protection certificate (SPC) will incentivise plant protection companies to participate in the unitary patent system. In the absence of a robust unitary certification system, there would be uncertainty and inconsistency in the European Union as regards the implementation and validity of unit certificates.
Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put AEPLA next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Organizations that also filed on at least two of the same consultations. A shared interest in the same dossiers, not evidence of coordination, and we do not suggest any.
Showing 5 of 8.
Everything on this page comes from AEPLA’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.