5 submissions from 5 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 183 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 5 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
CommitteeEMPLRapporteurIrena Joveva (Renew)
Commission plans implementing act under parent act · 28 Jun 2026
Published in the Official Journal · 12 Dec 2025
Signed · 26 Nov 2025
Approval of the Council’s first reading position by the EP (adoption of the legislative act) · 13 Nov 2025
Plenary Vote · 13 Nov 2025
Who showed up
0 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 3 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.
Industry 0Civil society 3Public authorities, academia, other 2
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 19 Mar 2023 — it ran from 22 Jan 2023.
Istanbul Bilgi University Privacy Innovation Lab Comment on European Commission regulation proposal on European statistics on population (ESOP) At Istanbul Bilgi University Privacy Innovation Lab we are thrilled to witness that Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PETs) are included in the legal proposal in explicit wording in Article 13/(3)(b) and Article 13/(4).
The Center for Data Innovation (Transparency Register #: 367682319221-26) is pleased to submit this feedback on the European Commissions consultation and call for evidence regarding the regulation on European statistics on population and housing, amending Regulation (EC) No 862/2007 and repealing Regulations (EC) No 763/2008 and (EU) No 1260/2013.
It has been interesting to read about the current developments at the EU level concerning Population statistics and I fully agree with the 3 main issues you identify with current population statistics. My feedback on the revision of ESOP is from the point of view of a data user (academic / researcher) with an interest in migration dynamics, especially child migration.
Currently in the EU there are no exact statistics on people with different types of disabilities. This, for instance, does not allow us to know how many people with different (or multiple) disabilities are out of the labour market and education.
EU-level data collection is key to understanding how well the EU and its Member States are implementing the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). When done effectively, this data can form the basis for our understanding of how our societies are progressing in realising the rights of persons with disabilities.
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.