Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

2021/0428(COD) · In Force

Schengen Borders Code

2 submissions from 2 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 220 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 2 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Committee LIBERapporteur Sylvie Guillaume (S&D)
  1. Discussions within the Council or its preparatory bodies · 17 Jul 2024
  2. Discussions within the Council or its preparatory bodies · 1 Jul 2024
  3. Published in the Official Journal · 20 Jun 2024
  4. Signed · 13 Jun 2024
  5. Approval of the EP's first reading position by the Council (adoption of the legislative act) · 23 May 2024

Who showed up

0 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 2 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 0Civil society 2Public authorities, academia, other 0

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 7 Apr 2022 — it ran from 20 Dec 2021.

Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
In Force
Lead committee
LIBE
Commission reference
COM(2021)891

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep5 Feb 2021
  2. Public consultation16 Mar 2021
  3. Proposal for a regulation6 Apr 2022
  4. Proposal for a regulation7 Apr 2022

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned.

Showing 2 of 2 submissions.

AP
PDF

The Proposal on the amendment of the Schengen Border Code (SBC) appears as an answer to the crises and challenges faced by the Schengen area in recent years. Even though the Impact Assessment Report accompanying the Proposal points to the fact that migratory flows have returned to the levels before 2015 and do not justify the reintroduction of internal borders, in the Proposal migration is presented as a threat for…

LinkedInX
EW

Europe without Barriers

· · filed 5 Feb 2021 · source

Internal and external borders are vividly connected. We suggest that any easing at the internal borders will lead to stricter and tougher checks at the external ones, especially in case of scenario 4 is applied (still #3 and #4 seem to be the most beneficial for the EU).

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 2 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.