Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Review of the VAT rules for financial and insurance services

18 submissions from 18 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 497 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 18 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

16 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 1 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 16 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 16Civil society 1Public authorities, academia, other 1

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

What the room declares

10 of 18
in the EU Register
81
full-time lobbying staff
€14.3M+
declared costs a year
55
EP accreditations declared

Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026). The cost figure sums band floors, so the true total is higher.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 3 May 2021 — it ran from 8 Feb 2021.

Policy area
Taxation & trade (DG TAXUD)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Dec 2021

How it got here

  1. Impact assess incep19 Nov 2020
  2. Public consultation3 May 2021

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Prop dir.

Showing 18 of 18 submissions.

DF

Dutch Federation of Pension Funds

· · filed 19 Nov 2020 · source

PDF

Dutch pension funds are strongly committed to deliver pension services on behalf of and in the interest of those who work in the Netherlands, either living in the Netherlands or any other Member State. They seek for the lowest cost and the appropriate investment policy (maximizing risk-adjusted returns) and structure their activities according to these objectives (either through insourcing or outsourcing).

LinkedInX
E

EFAMA

· · filed 19 Nov 2020 · source

PDF

EFAMA is grateful for the opportunity to comment on some of the messages included in the European Commission's roadmap on the "Review of VAT rules on financial services". Our comments cover the following sections of the roadmap: - Section A (Box1 - Problem the initiative aims to tackle: the lack of tax neutrality) - Section B (objectives and policy options) - Section C (Preliminary Assessment of Expected Impacts) -…

LinkedInX
IE

Insurance Europe

· · filed 19 Nov 2020 · source

Insurance Europe welcomes the possibility to comment on the Roadmap/Inception Impact Assessment for the review of the VAT rules for financial and insurance services. We believe that an effort is required to harmonise VAT rules across Europe, establish a level playing field on VAT for all financial services providers, create legal certainty and ensure that European VAT law is fit and proper for the modern business…

LinkedInX
F

FFA

· · filed 19 Nov 2020 · source

The French Insurance Federation is grateful for the opportunity to comment on the enclosed roadmap for a review of VAT rules applicable to financial and insurance services. The industry fully supports the initiative for a global review of current applicable VAT rules.

LinkedInX
SB

Swedish Bankers' Association

· · filed 19 Nov 2020 · source

The Swedish Bankers’ Association (SBA) welcomes the initiative from the European Commission regarding the review of the VAT rules for financial services and appreciates the opportunity to comment on the Roadmap/Inception Impact Assessment.

LinkedInX
F

FNMF

· · filed 19 Nov 2020 · source

First of all, it seems to me essential to distinguish between the various so-called financial activities. The following comments concern the insurance sector. 1- The abolition of the exemption In the insurance sector, if the abolition of the exemption could be favourable and promote VAT neutrality, it is on condition that VAT replaces the other turnover taxes borne by the final consumer.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
SS

Österreichischer Sparkassenverband

· · filed 19 Nov 2020 · source

General comments: We welcome the EU Commission's initiative to evaluate the EU VAT rules for financial and insurance services. As comprehensibly presented in the now published "Combined Evaluation Roadmap/Inception Impact Assessment" (short: CER/IIA), the following issues in particular - the lack of VAT neutrality, - the regulatory complexity of the regulations and - the legal uncertainty caused by different…

LinkedInX
IE

Invest Europe

· · filed 19 Nov 2020 · source

The private equity industry welcomes the European Commission's initiative to assess the relevance of the current VAT rules for financial and insurance services, notably in the light of developments in the sectors and recent case law challenging practices allowed by most Member States.

LinkedInX
P

PensionsEurope

· · filed 19 Nov 2020 · source

PDF

Read attached PensionsEurope's complete feedback. In summary: PensionsEurope supports the EC’s objective to simplify the life of taxpayers operating in the Single Market and we welcome the review of the VAT rules.

LinkedInX
EA

European Association of Cooperative Banks

· · filed 19 Nov 2020 · source

PDF

The EACB welcomes the modernization of the VAT treatment of financial services as the existing regulations are out-of-date and do no longer reflect current practices in the financial sector. The current situation leads to legal uncertainty and an unbalanced level playing field and thus a lack of neutrality.

LinkedInX
BE

BIPAR (European Federation of Insurance & Financial Intermediaries)

· · filed 19 Nov 2020 · source

PDF

BIPAR welcomes Europe’s objectives set out in the Commission Roadmap to clarify the VAT rules for the financial and insurance services where it is necessary. BIPAR is of the opinion that, when considering changes in the VAT treatment of insurance services, it is important to take into account the insurance premium tax (IPT) which varies from one Member-State to another.

LinkedInX
GV

Groupe VYV

· · filed 18 Nov 2020 · source

The VYV Group (Harmonie Mutuelle, MGEN, MNT, MGEFI, Mutuelle Mare-Gaillard, SMACL Assurances, etc.), established in 2017, is the 1st mutual health and social protection actor in France. All the components of the group and their 45 000 staff, protect around 10 million people and propose solutions tailored to more than 89 000 health and welfare companies and more than 84 000 legal entities in IARD.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
ET

European Tax Adviser Federation - ETAF

· · filed 18 Nov 2020 · source

PDF

The European Tax Adviser Federation, ETAF, is a European umbrella organisation for more than 280.000 tax professionals from France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, Romania, Hungary and Austria. ETAF thanks the Commission for the opportunity to comment on its Roadmap / Inception impact assessment on the “Review of the VAT rules for financial and insurance services”.

LinkedInX
AF

Austrian Federal Economic Chamber (WKÖ) - Division Bank & Insurance

· · filed 18 Nov 2020 · source

We welcome the initiative taken by the EU Commission to review the EU VAT rules for financial and insurance services. As stated by the Commission in its “Combined Evaluation Roadmap / Inception Impact Assessment” (CER / IIA for short), • the lack of VAT neutrality, • the regulatory complexity of the VAT rules and • the legal uncertainty caused by differing provisions in the EU member states pose obstacles for a…

LinkedInX

• EAPSPI supports the initiative of the EU Commission to review relevant VAT rules and see leeways for the clarification of the legal base of VAT exemptions of (public sector) pensions schemes in the EU – but we are clearly against a general abolition of the system of VAT exemptions or relevant VAT exemptions as described as clearly preferable solution of the Commission in the VAT roadmap.

LinkedInX
E

ESBG

· · filed 18 Nov 2020 · source

PDF

ESBG strongly supports the modernization of the VAT treatment of financial services as the existing regulations are out-of-date and do no longer reflect current practices in the financial sector. This leads to legal uncertainty and a lack of neutrality.

LinkedInX
CO

Confederation of Swedish Enterprise

· · filed 18 Nov 2020 · source

PDF

Introductory remarks The Confederation of Swedish Enterprise welcomes the envisaged review due to the fact that many problems arise from the current VAT framework regarding financial and insurance services. The current rules entail increased costs for start-ups and SMEs, different approaches from member states, an unlevel playing field and great complexity.

LinkedInX
A

AMAFI

· · filed 17 Nov 2020 · source

PDF

AMAFI has always promoted actions for the integration of European financial markets. The Commission’s work on a possible revision of the VAT rules on financial and insurance services undoubtedly contributes to this search for greater economic efficiency in favour of an integrated European market for financial services.

Filed in French · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 18 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.