Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Evaluation of the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA)

9 submissions from 9 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 39 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 9 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

6 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 1 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions. That is 6 industry submissions for every one from civil society.

Industry 6Civil society 1Public authorities, academia, other 2

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 2 Sept 2022 — it ran from 10 Jun 2022.

Policy area
Transport (DG MOVE)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
30 Jun 2022

How it got here

  1. Roadmap efc29 Mar 2021
  2. Public consultation2 Sept 2022

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Swd.

Showing 9 of 9 submissions.

ZG

Zeleros Global SL (Zeleros hyperloop)

· · filed 29 Mar 2021 · source

PDF

ZELEROS HYPERLOOP acknowledges the important work done by ERA from 2016 to 2021, and welcomes the European Commission evaluation of the agency’s work, as required by Article 82(1) of the Agency’s founding Regulation (EU) 2016/796 to provide our vision in relation to this new transport system.

LinkedInX
HT

Hyperloop Transportation Technologies

· · filed 29 Mar 2021 · source

HyperloopTT welcomes the EC initiative of the evaluation for the European Union Agency for Railways, to which we would like to provide our contribution. We thank ERA for their continuous support in the past 2 years in the framework of the Hyperloop Promoters Meetings of DG Move / Shift2Rail, in the form of explanations, availability for consultations, and research.

LinkedInX
EE

EIM - European Railway Infrastructure Managers

· · filed 29 Mar 2021 · source

The European Railway Infrastructure Managers (E.I.M. www.eimrail.org) welcomes and supports the roadmap of the evaluation of the EU Agency for Railways. EIM believes that particular attention in the evaluation should be given to: 1. ERA's staff and digital skills: ERA to consider how to attract and retain skilled staff, and to prepare for the digital movements..

LinkedInX
OE

Oficina española del Corredor Mediterraneo

· · filed 29 Mar 2021 · source

From the Government Office for the Correodor Mediterrraneo. The achievement of a single European railway area is an ambitious and necessary objective to increase the presence of trains in passenger and freight mobility in Europe, interoperability being the vector for achieving this objective.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
AN

Association NB-Rail

· · filed 29 Mar 2021 · source

Aim of NB-Rail Association feedback aims to support the Agency (EUAR / ERA) in the improvement of its working practices. We recommend the Agency to precisely listen to the sector in important work streams when the sector tries to keep the Agency “on the right track” e.g.

LinkedInX
U

UNIFE

· · filed 28 Mar 2021 · source

UNIFE, the association representing Europe’s rail supply industry, welcomes and supports the roadmap of the evaluation of the EU Agency for Railways. UNIFE appreciates the purpose and scope of the evaluation and the methodology described.

LinkedInX
NN

NSA Norway

· · filed 26 Mar 2021 · source

NSA Norway welcomes the European Commission initiative to evaluate the work of the EU Agency for Railways. NSA Norway believes the Road Map on the evaluation of the work of the EU Agency for Railways overall covers the necessary points in such an evaluation. There are, however, a few points which might be beneficial to consider during the development of the evaluation, and possibly as part of the evaluation. 1.

LinkedInX
ED

European Disability Forum (EDF)

· · filed 19 Mar 2021 · source

PDF

The European Disability Forum (EDF) has been involved in the ERA Working Party tasked with the review and amendment of the TSI-PRM for more than a decade and considers it very useful for implementing the Regulation to advance accessibility of rail infrastructure and rolling stock for persons with disabilities.

LinkedInX
CO

Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies (CER aisbl)

· · filed 18 Mar 2021 · source

The Community of European Railway and Infrastructure Companies (CER) appreciates and fully supports this EC initiative of a "fitness check" for the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA). ERA is a pivotal player and an important interlocutor for the European railway actors. A well functioning and efficient Agency is one of the prerequisites for a vital, high-preforming and competitive European railway sector.

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 9 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.