Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Evaluation of State aid instruments

1 submissions from 1 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 192 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 1 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

1 submissions from industry and none from civil society organizations.

Industry 1Civil society 0Public authorities, academia, other 0

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 19 Jul 2019 — it ran from 26 Apr 2019.

Policy area
Agriculture (DG AGRI)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption

How it got here

  1. Roadmap18 May 2017
  2. Public consultation19 Jul 2019

Showing 1 of 1 submission.

F

federimpreseitalia

· · filed 27 Apr 2017 · source

We hope that the assessment of what actually achieves a reduction of administrative burden for beneficiaries and a reduction of the distortions on the real competitiveness. In fact, as explained above, often support measures (economic) provided by the EU favours recipients with major infrastructure (and willingness) — often also thanks to the detriment of mafia infiltration -a micro enterprise, which will thus…

Filed in Italian · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 1 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.