2 submissions from 2 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.
The Commission lists 24 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 2 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.
Who showed up
1 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 1 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.
Industry 1Civil society 1Public authorities, academia, other 0
Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.
The file, right now
The consultation closed on 24 Mar 2022 — it ran from 10 Dec 2021.
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Legislative stage
Commission Proposal
Commission reference
COM(2021)780
How it got here
Impact assess incep16 Nov 2020
Public consultation14 Jun 2021
Prop dir24 Mar 2022
Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Prop reco.
Born Free welcomes the opportunity to provide feedback on this initiative that provides an opportunity to improve the effectiveness of EU efforts against wildlife trafficking. Illegal wildlife trade poses serious threats to wildlife conservation and biosecurity, and often involves organised criminal networks which operate across international borders.
Microsoft thanks the European Commission for this opportunity to share its view on enhancing EU police cooperation. We look forward to continue the cooperation with the EU on this topic and have attached a file with our input and suggestions. Kind regards.
Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.