Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files

EU consultation

Ecodesign requirements for cooking appliances (review)

8 submissions from 7 organizations told the European Commission what they think about this file. Here is what each of them said, in their own words.

The Commission lists 51 submissions on this file. Shown here: the 8 from organizations. Not shown, by design: submissions from private individuals, which we never publish, and anything filed since our last weekly refresh.

Who showed up

3 submissions from industry — companies and their trade associations — against 5 from civil society: NGOs, consumer organizations, environmental groups and trade unions.

Industry 3Civil society 5Public authorities, academia, other 0

Groupings use the respondent type each organization selected when filing. Counting submissions, not organizations — a body that filed twice is counted twice.

The file, right now

The consultation closed on 31 Aug 2023 — it ran from 8 Jun 2023.

Policy area
Energy (DG ENER)
Where it stands
Awaiting adoption
Adoption expected
31 Mar 2028 · in 576 days

How it got here

  1. Call for evidence · impact assessment30 May 2023
  2. Public consultation31 Aug 2023

Also on the Commission’s pipeline for this file, with no date recorded: Initiative planned, Reg draft, Reg.

Showing 8 of 8 submissions.

EP

European Public Health Alliance (EPHA)

· · filed 30 May 2023 · source

PDF

EPHA welcomes the review of Eco-design and Energy labelling for cooking appliances, and the possibility to provide input on this Call for Evidence. This review process represents an immediate opportunity to set strict nitrogen dioxide (NO2) emission limits for appliances and phase out the sale of gas cooking appliances, addressing pollution directly at the source. Please find attached our full answer.

LinkedInX
E

ECOS

· · filed 30 May 2023 · source

PDF

ECOS welcomes the possibility of providing feedback on this Call for Evidence, please find attached the full answer to this initiative. The full document focuses on the following points: (1) measurement and test methods, where ECOS strongly suggest having a common testing method for electric and gas hobs; (2) requirements for energy and material efficiency, current ambition is rather low and ECOS advocate for a more…

LinkedInX
PS

Polish Society for Health Programs

· · filed 29 May 2023 · source

Polish Society for Health Programs welcomes the review of Eco-design and Energy labelling for cooking appliances, and the inclusion of air pollutant emissions in the scope of the impact assessment. This is a very important issue in Poland, where over 43% of the population uses gas for cooking and is therefore experiencing higher risks of negative health outcomes.

LinkedInX
FN

Federación de consumidores CECU

· · filed 29 May 2023 · source

From an environmental perspective, it is necessary to phase out gas cooktops from the market. For this reason, we consider an energy label that’s a comparison of gas and electric cooktops from 2025 to be essential.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
A

APPLiA

· · filed 26 May 2023 · source

PDF

Please find attached APPLiA's input on the call for evidence related to the revision of the ecodesign and labelling of cooking appliances. A number of comments stam from the ones sent to the Commission on the preparatory ecodesign study that DG ENER presented during the Consultation Forum meeting on the 29th of November 2022. They can be found in the Annex.

LinkedInX
IA

ISDE, Associazione Medici per l'Ambiente

· · filed 26 May 2023 · source

The gas stoves being one of the main indoor sources of health harming pollutants, most notably nitrogen dioxide (NO2), this process represents an opportunity to further protect and improve the health of European citizens by setting a clear path to phasing out gas stoves.

LinkedInX
ES

Eika S.Coop.

· · filed 3 May 2023 · source

Comments ON 2022 JRC REPORT named Preparatory STUDY OF Ecodesign AND ENERGY LABELLING MEASURES FOR domestic COOKING APPLIANCES Please find below my comments on electric hobs proposals based on the above report. Standing by consumption I Wonder if and where this energy is taken into consideration on the analysis. I dont see it in 5.1.2.4 where use-phase is calculated and only energy-for-cooking is considered.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
ES

Eika S.Coop.

· · filed 3 May 2023 · source

Comments ON 2022 JRC REPORT named Preparatory STUDY OF Ecodesign AND ENERGY LABELLING MEASURES FOR domestic COOKING APPLIANCES Please find below my comments on electric hobs proposals based on the above report. Standing by consumption I Wonder if and where this energy is taken into consideration on the analysis. I dont see it in 5.1.2.4 where use-phase is calculated and only energy-for-cooking is considered.

Filed in Spanish · English published by the European Commission

LinkedInX
Take the dataCSV — all 8 submissionsJSONFull text, not the excerpt. Free to cite.Search every submission →

Follow this file

Get an email when a new organization files a position here: one email on Tuesdays, only when there is something new. Free.

We use your email for updates on this file, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Method. Every quote is verbatim from the organization’s own submission to the European Commission, trimmed to its opening passage and never summarized by a model. Where a submission was filed in another EU language we show the English text the European Commission publishes alongside it, labeled on the quote; the original is one click away at the source. Groupings use the respondent type the organization itself selected when filing. We deliberately do not label anyone “supportive” or “opposed” — you read what they wrote and draw your own conclusion. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.