Dear European Commission, We were forced to insert the following file „COM (2021) 202 and Annexes_ENG_comments TISR_Mr.Paska, Hegyi_ver1.docx“ again. The reason for the re-insertion was that the originally uploaded post file had limited edits. Please confirm to the e-mail address: [email removed] whether the file could be opened without any problems. Thank you for understanding.
TIP
TECHNICKÁ INŠPEKCIA, a.s.
Other · Slovakia
not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.
3
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
1
legislative file
of 583 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Track TECHNICKÁ in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at TECHNICKÁ INŠPEKCIA, a.s.? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
TECHNICKÁ INŠPEKCIA, a.s. filed 3 positions between 11 Feb 2019 and 15 Aug 2021, across 1 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2019 · 1 filed2021 · 2 filed
What they argued
Dear European Commission, TECHNICKÁ INŠPEKCIA, a.s., Slovakia, as an independent inspection, certification organization and notified body (NB 1354), sends you the following document in the attachment: • „COM (2021) 202 and Annexes_ENG_comments TISR_Mr.Paska, Hegyi_ver1.docx“ Comments on the proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on machinery products and Comments on the Annexes to…
Increase in the use of industrial robots as well as the onset of collaborative robots in industry with requirements to increase their artificial intelligence and the use of digital technologies has a considerable impact and pressure on the revision of the existing Machinery Directive.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put TECHNICKÁ INŠPEKCIA, a.s. next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from TECHNICKÁ INŠPEKCIA, a.s.’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.