Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
As a professional organisation representing the interests of economic players in the hunting, sport shooting and safety equipment sector in France, SNAFAM has developed the proposals and guidelines addressed through this introduction to the impact study. We have expressed opinions that are part of the analysis delivered independently by the IEACS.
Filed in French · English published by the European Commission
En temps qu' organisation professionnelle représentant les intérêts des acteurs économiques du secteur de la chasse, du tir sportif et des équipements de sécurité en France, le SNAFAM a étudié les propositions et orientations envisagées au travers de cette introduction d'étude d'impact. Nous avons exprimé des opinions qui sont parties prenantes de l'analyse délivrée indépendamment par l'IEACS.
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put SNAFAM next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from SNAFAM’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.