Skip to main content
PolicySpeak
← All files
PU

Princeton University

Academic / research · United States

not in the EU Transparency RegisterThis organization files on consultations without a register number, so its record here is built from its filings alone. Register facts — staff, costs, accreditations — are not available for it.

2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
1
with a full position paper
attached to a submission

Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.

Track Princeton in PolicySpeak: request access →

Work at Princeton University? so we know who speaks for it.

Follow the files Princeton University engages with

One email on Tuesdays when a new position is filed on these 2 files, from Princeton University or from anyone else on them. Only when there is something new.

We use your email for these updates, and PolicySpeak may contact you about the product. Unsubscribe in one click. Privacy policy.

Their record over time

Princeton University filed 2 positions between 26 Nov 2020 and 2 Jun 2023, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 1 time.

2020 · 1 filed2023 · 1 filed

What they argued

Monitoring, reporting and verification of greenhouse gas emissions from maritime transportfiled 26 Nov 2020source

The European Trading System would be reformed so that it no longer treats biomass combustion as carbon neutral. This assumption is based on an accounting error that dates to the misinterpretation of IPCC national reporting guidance. In that guidance, countries can ignore the emissions from burning biomass only if they count the carbon removed from a forest or otherwise in the land use sector.

Performance of independent audits provided for in the Digital Services Actfiled 2 Jun 2023PDFsource

Dear European Commission, Thank you for the opportunity to submit feedback to the Draft Delegated Regulation on Conducting Independent Audits under the Digital Services Act. My feedback (in the attached document) follows from my experience of conducting independent audits of platforms for privacy violations and algorithmic discrimination.

Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.

Put Princeton University next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →

Is this your organization?

Everything on this page comes from Princeton University’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.

Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.