There are multiple reasons to suggest though that moving to qualified majority voting in taxation is not the best tool to achieve the objectives of the proposal.. Moving to qualified majority voting in taxation would destroy tax competition between countries, and this would have adverse effects.
LFM
Lithuanian Free Market Institute (LFMI)
NGO · Lithuania · EU Transparency Register 222186719128-03
2
positions filed
in the 583 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 583 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 583 consultation files tracked so far (42,224 submissions, mostly 2025–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 140 think tanks and research institutions on this site, they rank #76 by legislative files engaged — a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
1.2
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
—
declared costs / yr (floor)
0
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2015
in the register since
Declares membership of
- EPICENTER European Policy Information Center https://www.epicenternetwork.eu/group/lithuanian-free-market-institute-l…
- ATLAS Network https://www.atlasnetwork.org/
- 4LIBERTY.eu http://4liberty.eu/think-tanks/the-lithuanian-free-market-institute-lfmi/
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026).
- Register category
- Think tanks and research institutions
- Registered as
- Lithuanian Free Market Institute (LFMI)
- Head office
- Vilnius, Lithuania
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 2 Sept 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Lithuanian in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Lithuanian Free Market Institute (LFMI)? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Lithuanian Free Market Institute (LFMI) filed 2 positions between 17 Jan 2019 and 14 Feb 2022, across 2 of the 583 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2019 · 1 filed2022 · 1 filed
What they argued
Maintaining the status quo and fostering competition among platforms would better serve the platform workers and consumers The Directive of the European Parliament and Council on improving working conditions on platform work (hereinafter – the Draft Directive, the Directive) lays down intricate requirements for platforms whose application is likely to have serious unintended consequences for the consumers and…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Lithuanian Free Market Institute (LFMI) next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Lithuanian Free Market Institute (LFMI)’s own submissions to the European Commission — we have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.