Linklaters welcomes the opportunity to comment as part of this consultation. We recognise the EC's efforts to evaluate the effective functioning of the Directives and we welcome reform which simplifies and modernises current public procurement regimes, strengthens EU competitiveness, and drives social, economic and environmental value and innovation.
LL
Linklaters LLP
Company · United Kingdom · EU Transparency Register 75449787878-94
2
positions filed
in the 665 files tracked
2
legislative files
of 665 tracked
2
with a full position paper
attached to a submission
Counts here are a floor, never a total: they cover the 665 consultation files tracked so far (57,800 submissions, mostly 2021–26), so an organization's real filing history is larger, not smaller.
Who they are
Among the 11 law firms on this site, they rank #5 by legislative files engaged, a count of participation, not a measure of influence.
4
declared lobbying FTE
self-declared
–
declared costs / yr (floor)
2
EP accreditations
as declared to the register
2012
in the register since
Declares membership of
- Global Competition Law Centre
- International Competition Network
- British Chamber of Commerce to the EU
- American Chamber of Commerce to the EU →
- European Fund and Asset Management Association
- Association for Financial Markets in Europe
- ISDA →
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026).
- Register category
- Law firms
- Head office
- London, United kingdom
- EU office
- Brussels
Self-declared to the EU Transparency Register (snapshot 15 Oct 2026); cost bands are floors, not audited totals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU.
Track Linklaters in PolicySpeak: request access →
Work at Linklaters LLP? so we know who speaks for it.
Their record over time
Linklaters LLP filed 2 positions between 24 Apr 2023 and 26 Jan 2026, across 2 of the 665 legislative files tracked here, attaching a full position paper 2 times.
2023 · 1 filed2026 · 1 filed
What they argued
Our main comment is that legal tests that are too broad or vague should be avoided as these may lead to uncertainty. As we explain in our paper, this may be the case of (i) the new standard for market foreclosure, defined as conduct which adversely impacts an effective competitive structure instead of impacting competitors, (ii) the relaxation of the general principle that only the exclusion of competitors as…
Looking for an argument rather than an organization? Search every submission for a phrase and see everyone who used it.
Put Linklaters LLP next to another organization. Same files, same register facts, side by side. Compare →
Is this your organization?
Everything on this page comes from Linklaters LLP’s own submissions to the European Commission. We have added nothing and interpreted nothing. If something is wrong or out of date, email info@policyspeak.com and we will correct it. If you are an individual named in a record, our privacy policy sets out your rights to correction, objection and removal.
Quotes are verbatim from submissions published by the European Commission, trimmed to their opening passage and never summarized by a model. Organizations only, never individuals. Reused under Commission Decision 2011/833/EU; the European Commission is not liable for this reuse.